I'd love this!
Type: Posts; User: Stoked
I'd love this!
You seem overly interested in our profession as "butt pirates". You looking to get plundered?
Since when did evidence ever matter in a conversation with you?
I think the disagreement is even smaller than that. We both want to go with the youth. I just think they will put Utah where they ended this year roughly. Also thanks!
Maybe we should wait for evidence before assuming these groups did. But you have no interest in real discussion. Just trolling. Please continue.
Thank heaven for miracles right?
Hello Mr. Pot.
That is what we call an opinion.
I never said all either.
Can you show me where I ever said progressive?
Also no it is not my interpretation, That is what the report says. Now is the report true, That's the question.
Go read the OIG report in regards to the pass that liberal groups got.
2314
Kennedy Ann
Sent from an IPhone using tapacrap walkie talkie or something like that.
http://m.usatoday.com/article/news/2159983
States that the IRS went after group's based on policy stances and not political activity. Also talks about conservative groups applications being held...
I guess it would matter at how much that .03% has.
What I wonder is what is the point? How many people in drunk accidents measure above .05 and below .08? Is it really a problem or is it more of...
Perhaps but that is not how I see his reply.
To me his reply hinges around the clause "...most of their money go to advertising that...". If most of their money goes toward advertising that then...
No, his statement would either be law or it wouldn't. If a group spends most of their money on advertising and other non politcal events then they would qualify. Now, wether that should be the law...
You and me both. Though it will be politics as usual I fear.
Hi northeast! Where have you been?
I helped you out a little.
Completely irrelevant.
That is exactly what he was just wondering and what I was asking for stats on. Talk about not reading...
Again, all you did was distinguish what I was asking for in a wordier way.
For the pickier readers I guess...
And you just type crap.
The IRS disagreed.
All you have is a definition of what qualifies. You have no details on the operations of the exact groups applying. So you cannot judge wether they qualify or not.
I highlighted the major problem with your approach.