To be clear, it's not the GMs, coaches, assistants, or even scouts .. it's the agents and the people they (for example) 'hire' to get to the kids and get in their ears about signing with a firm. I wasn't calling the NBA personnel sleazy. They were always all class. It was the guys showing up at recess (no kidding) and at the Burger King parking lots on Friday nights. That doesn't happen at the college level .. but agents are the worst. Well .. and the show companies.
Sandy Braille wrote: Scrodum to Penes!!!! ALLEY-OOP!!! U Gotta Love It Baby!!!
To add to this .. the colleges have a great system of insulation, great compliance departments, they educate the players what to watch for/watch out for .. the kids have a great support system. HS's have NONE of that and kids are lied to, hyped up, and too often ruined or ruin their chances..
Sandy Braille wrote: Scrodum to Penes!!!! ALLEY-OOP!!! U Gotta Love It Baby!!!
Just making sure you saw post #2013, orangello. No need to reply, just making sure you got all my reasoning..
Sandy Braille wrote: Scrodum to Penes!!!! ALLEY-OOP!!! U Gotta Love It Baby!!!
It makes total sense.
The thing that bothers me are players like Wiggins (who is an extreme example) and others like Bazz. They seem to already have enough talent to be in the league so why make them wait?
Again, I understand the crap that you allow at the HS level if you do that. I just wanted to get my opinion out there.
I understand. It's perplexing, but I think it's better than the wholesale alternative. I also think of it like this analogy.
There are very bright HS students that would make a brilliant engineer, but lack the maturity and training to immediately be worth hiring by an engineering firm. It's not all bad that these kids go to school for a year, learn to play as a team (most never have), learn responsibility at a higher level, learn about the NBA 'game' (the best coaches help the kids with how to handle the finances, how to handle agents, etc), learn how to handle a brighter spot light, and gain a year of maturity .. not to mention honing their skills another year.
Sandy Braille wrote: Scrodum to Penes!!!! ALLEY-OOP!!! U Gotta Love It Baby!!!
Great analogy, but you are missing the point. I am a fan of a team that is stuck in mediocrity. They won't trade all of their future assets or current players with potential for a superstar or someone close to it.
On the other side they won't give their players with potential all of the playing time that they need to be ready to make a serious impact by year 2 or year 3 of their NBA careers. They also won't deliberately tank in order to add top talent to their roster via the draft.
We are stuck in this ugly limbo thing and it is getting harder and harder to support.
If players had a chance to leave out of high school the team that I am a fan of might take a risk and be able to snatch someone that is a future superstar but they are underrated because they are coming out of high school.
I know there are a lot of holes in that theory but it is more realistic than the other scenarios that I outlined at the beginning of this rant.
Big update: CJ McCollum is out 8 to 10 weeks with a broken foot.
Cry baby..
Sandy Braille wrote: Scrodum to Penes!!!! ALLEY-OOP!!! U Gotta Love It Baby!!!
I'd like to see at 2 year college minimum. Just my opinion.
(first update) Offseason to-do list:
(no order)
1. Let Mo, Foyeeee3, Al (s&t?), Watson, and Tinsley go.
2. Re-sign Carroll
3. Draft McCollum, Schroeder, and Giannis (leave the latter two in Europe for a year [maybe two years for Giannis]).
4. Sign Tony Allen
5. Try to keep Millsap. If that doesn't work, explore s&t options.
6. Remove Corbin. Hire Brad Stevens or SVG.
7. Sign Calderon to a one-year (2 max) deal, or see if the cash-strapped Lakers will let us absorb Nash's last year.