Yeah Kirilenko is kicking some ass lately, but at the same time they go to him a lot.Originally Posted by Eenie-Meenie
I think Marvin is capable of the same type of numbers, but not in this current Corbin offense.
Adleman is a great coach, and I knew AK would have a great year under his system. It's a great thing.
I've always thought AK was the man.
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson
And without Love they'd be a lotto team. I don't see how AK makes much of a difference with this team.
maybe watch some games? They are without Love and Rubio and have 3-1 record, mainly due to a great play by AK... Better then Jazz's 2-3.
The Black Swordsman - a self proclaimed man of science who believes in flying winged horses.
Jerry Sloan: "I have to blame myself for Andrei's failure to be able to play at times because maybe I haven't handled him the way he'd like to be and done the right things"
The only thing AK is MVP at is lame World of Warcraft tattos, horrible contracts, missing too many games and crying during the playoffs.
I'm rooting for the next post in this thread to be at the end of the regular season, right before AK takes his European tour.
Then we can look at his completed stats all at once, and discuss it.
Please, make this happen.
Never go in against a Sicilian when death is on the line!
classic ignorant dumbass response. He is MVP of Eurochampionship 2007 and Euroleague 2011, just FIY. And he was MVP of the Jazz for numerous years.
The Black Swordsman - a self proclaimed man of science who believes in flying winged horses.
Jerry Sloan: "I have to blame myself for Andrei's failure to be able to play at times because maybe I haven't handled him the way he'd like to be and done the right things"
AKMVP do you think that AK did more harm then good or more good then harm for the Jazz?
أنا أذكى منك
Aš esu protingesni nei jūs
Numerous? I'll give him 1.5 for sure. Starting in 2005-06 it was either somewhat debatable (2005-06) or he simply wasn't the MVP of the team.
AK had some decent seasons on some bad Jazz teams. His contract handcuffed the Jazz for years. Not really his fault. I mean who wouldn't have taken that deal. Besides when the Jazz got DWill, Boozer & Okur, AK became an afterthought.
He actually might fit in pretty well in Minnesota. I still think they overpaid for him though.
Ad Hominem attack, another logical fallacy by the dimwitted and nitwitted AK haters
Why are you so blind, Chad. We argued for years about who was more valuable, AK or Boozer, and all the stats showed that it was AK. And this was with AK barely part of the offense and even being left on the bench by Jerry in favor of Harpring. AK's value has always been overlooked because he's not a big scorer, and when Boozer and Okur came aboard, both of whom are better shooters, AK's numbers went down and he became less a part of the team. This hurt his psyche and brought a decline of his play. I don't want to rehash this all over again. The dense dunces on this site are impossible to enlighten.
And yet you can't see history repeating when Love and Rubio get back...
People do not know what Ad Hominem means. If you insult someone it isn't automatically Ad Hominem.
أنا أذكى منك
Aš esu protingesni nei jūs
Yeah it's too bad the Jazz signed him or he could have had some great season leading a doormat nowhere.
They're attacking AK because they hate him, hate he didn't live up to his potential, hate that he cried, hate that he had a public feud with Jerry about his role, hate that he became injury prone, hate that he wasn't as good as Stockton or Malone, hate him because he was AK and not what they wanted him to be, just like the old story about JC Superstar, whom the Jews hated because he wasn't what they expected him to be.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
