View Poll Results: Bench Millsap?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, go Kanter.

    8 32.00%
  • No, Sap is a stud.

    14 56.00%
  • FIRE^99 Crowbin!

    12 48.00%
  • Millsap2short4ballin (c)

    13 52.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Drinkin haterade, ridin the hate train through hateville
    Posts
    13,410
    Total Rep Points
    32978
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0

    Millsap Looks Horrible!

    Millsap's defense has been nothing short of awful so far this season. He has played a huge role in allowing penetrating wings to get easy layups (although the hate crowd will undoubtedly blame it on Jefferson, regardless).

    Who here would support Corbin benching him in favor of Kanter even though it would cost the Jazz plenty of games?

  2. #2
    Senior Member fishonjazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    K-TOWN
    Posts
    19,025
    Total Rep Points
    43465
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    I think he should come off the bench, with favors starting, or we play the big 3 lineup of jefferson, favors, and millsap more.
    No good options to choose from in your poll however so no votes from me.

  3. #3
    Super Clutch Gameface's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    10,807
    Total Rep Points
    6463
    Rep Adjustment Power
    40
    It sucks that basketball players are human beings with egos. We need Millsap to come off the bench. I love the guy. He wouldn't lose any status in my eyes if he came off the bench. It'd be opposite actually if he did it with a positive attitude, but I don't think it'd go down like that.

  4. #4
    Senior Member NUMBERICA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    13,498
    Total Rep Points
    16533
    Rep Adjustment Power
    74
    The most bizarre thing about this post is the idea that Kanter should be starting. (Kanter + Al??? Kanter hasn't been good so far this year)
    Quote Originally Posted by Eenie-Meenie View Post
    I've never stalked anyone in my life, including any of my girl friends.

  5.  

     

  6. #5
    Senior Member sojodave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In Front Of My 100" Screen
    Posts
    1,903
    Total Rep Points
    2570
    Rep Adjustment Power
    24
    Millsap is an energy player. The second unit really needs some energy and a go to guy. If we don't do this, we are going to see Foye hoist up shots galore. I think this would help Favors and Millsap.

  7. #6
    Senior Member m3at's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    504
    Total Rep Points
    81
    Rep Adjustment Power
    17
    This poll is hilarious. I can select all answers. LOL.

  8. #7
    Senior Member NUMBERICA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    13,498
    Total Rep Points
    16533
    Rep Adjustment Power
    74
    If you bench Millsap for a player that hasn't earned the start, you had better trade him because he won't re-sign and that would suck.

    I have no doubts that Millsap would be a good soldier on a team that's winning and behind two players that there is no doubt are better.
    Quote Originally Posted by Eenie-Meenie View Post
    I've never stalked anyone in my life, including any of my girl friends.

  9. #8
    Senior Member Growlor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    262
    Total Rep Points
    605
    Rep Adjustment Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by fishonjazz View Post
    I think he should come off the bench, with favors starting, or we play the big 3 lineup of jefferson, favors, and millsap more.
    No good options to choose from in your poll however so no votes from me.
    Agreed.
    Why was there no option for starting Favors, or starting the big 3?

  10. #9
    Senior Member Scorpjazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    1,394
    Total Rep Points
    1340
    Rep Adjustment Power
    21
    Trade trade trade him..before he loses more value..other teams might still be fooled and think he is a legit starting PF. I dont buy that he will be cool coming off the bench. As Numb said, to do that you have to start players that he is better than right now. It might be best for the future Jazz, but no way Sap would be cool playing a bench role as Kanter starts. No way in hell, IMO. And to be truthful, I wouldnt blame him. If I were Sap, and Kanter started ahead of me, I would freak out.

  11. #10
    Moderator Stoked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southern Utah
    Posts
    21,763
    Total Rep Points
    28155
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    I wanted a bench Sap go Favors option.
    #BelieveInLindsey #BelieveInSnyder

    I Got a feeling that tonight's gonna be a good night; that tonight's gonna be a good night;
    that tonight's gonna be a good good night; wooh hoo (x4) - For Cy

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,524
    Total Rep Points
    827
    Rep Adjustment Power
    19
    1280 radio had an NBA scout-ESPN guy, 4 pm Monday. He said that they will not really go anywhere with Sap as the PF.

    I tend to agree, he is just too small. He can look great at times but bigger guys can make him dissappear. And he lead the league in fouling.

  13. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Drinkin haterade, ridin the hate train through hateville
    Posts
    13,410
    Total Rep Points
    32978
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    The most bizarre thing about this post is the idea that Kanter should be starting. (Kanter + Al??? Kanter hasn't been good so far this year)
    Quote Originally Posted by Growlor View Post
    Agreed.
    Why was there no option for starting Favors, or starting the big 3?
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoked View Post
    I wanted a bench Sap go Favors option.
    Gangnamit you illiterate crotch knuckles, the poll is not about who starts for ****s sake. The inner circle is trolling my thread!

  14. #13
    Senior Member midnight_hwy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    756
    Total Rep Points
    329
    Rep Adjustment Power
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoked View Post
    I wanted a bench Sap go Favors option.
    This.
    That would be the one I would choose too.

  15. #14
    Wide Awake Stifle Tower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On the Snyde
    Posts
    15,841
    Total Rep Points
    29089
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by franklin View Post
    Millsap's defense has been nothing short of awful so far this season. He has played a huge role in allowing penetrating wings to get easy layups (although the hate crowd will undoubtedly blame it on Jefferson, regardless).

    Who here would support Corbin benching him in favor of Kanter even though it would cost the Jazz plenty of games?
    1. You mean we'd lose MORE than 75% of our games?
    2. It's really a rhetorical question because we all know Corbin is never going to bench a veteran in order to play a 20-yr old.

    Fortunately, the play of Millsap is likely dropping his value. So look for KOC/Lindsey to make the bold move of only offering him a deal for 6 yrs/$72M.
    Lose One More For OKAFOR!

    No More Frowns If We Get TOWNS!

    Shout Hooray for MUDIAY!

  16. #15
    Senior Member pickledXgrandma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    the sugar hole
    Posts
    999
    Total Rep Points
    3112
    Rep Adjustment Power
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by franklin View Post
    Millsap's defense has been nothing short of awful so far this season. He has played a huge role in allowing penetrating wings to get easy layups (although the hate crowd will undoubtedly blame it on Jefferson, regardless).

    Who here would support Corbin benching him in favor of Kanter even though it would cost the Jazz plenty of games?
    So it would cost us many games? Umm were 1 and 3, I don't think it will cost us any....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •