View Poll Results: Bench Millsap?

Voters
25. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, go Kanter.

    8 32.00%
  • No, Sap is a stud.

    14 56.00%
  • FIRE^99 Crowbin!

    12 48.00%
  • Millsap2short4ballin (c)

    13 52.00%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22
  1. #1
    Senior Member franklin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Drinkin haterade, ridin the hate train through hateville
    Posts
    12,757
    Rep Power
    116
    Rep Level
    29759

    Millsap Looks Horrible!

    Millsap's defense has been nothing short of awful so far this season. He has played a huge role in allowing penetrating wings to get easy layups (although the hate crowd will undoubtedly blame it on Jefferson, regardless).

    Who here would support Corbin benching him in favor of Kanter even though it would cost the Jazz plenty of games?
    No Mediocrity

  2. #2
    Senior Member fishonjazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    K-TOWN
    Posts
    15,788
    Rep Power
    130
    Rep Level
    34178
    I think he should come off the bench, with favors starting, or we play the big 3 lineup of jefferson, favors, and millsap more.
    No good options to choose from in your poll however so no votes from me.

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9,571
    Rep Power
    0
    Rep Level
    0
    It sucks that basketball players are human beings with egos. We need Millsap to come off the bench. I love the guy. He wouldn't lose any status in my eyes if he came off the bench. It'd be opposite actually if he did it with a positive attitude, but I don't think it'd go down like that.

  4. #4
    Senior Member NUMBERICA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    13,134
    Rep Power
    67
    Rep Level
    14760
    The most bizarre thing about this post is the idea that Kanter should be starting. (Kanter + Al??? Kanter hasn't been good so far this year)
    Quote Originally Posted by every forum dreg
    I think he can play SF

  5. #5
    Senior Member sojodave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In Front Of My 100" Screen
    Posts
    1,748
    Rep Power
    19
    Rep Level
    1796
    Millsap is an energy player. The second unit really needs some energy and a go to guy. If we don't do this, we are going to see Foye hoist up shots galore. I think this would help Favors and Millsap.

  6. #6
    Senior Member m3at's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    504
    Rep Power
    16
    Rep Level
    81
    This poll is hilarious. I can select all answers. LOL.

  7. #7
    Senior Member NUMBERICA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    13,134
    Rep Power
    67
    Rep Level
    14760
    If you bench Millsap for a player that hasn't earned the start, you had better trade him because he won't re-sign and that would suck.

    I have no doubts that Millsap would be a good soldier on a team that's winning and behind two players that there is no doubt are better.
    Quote Originally Posted by every forum dreg
    I think he can play SF

  8.  

     

  9. #8
    Senior Member Growlor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    255
    Rep Power
    13
    Rep Level
    462
    Quote Originally Posted by fishonjazz View Post
    I think he should come off the bench, with favors starting, or we play the big 3 lineup of jefferson, favors, and millsap more.
    No good options to choose from in your poll however so no votes from me.
    Agreed.
    Why was there no option for starting Favors, or starting the big 3?

  10. #9
    Senior Member Scorpjazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    1,390
    Rep Power
    20
    Rep Level
    1340
    Trade trade trade him..before he loses more value..other teams might still be fooled and think he is a legit starting PF. I dont buy that he will be cool coming off the bench. As Numb said, to do that you have to start players that he is better than right now. It might be best for the future Jazz, but no way Sap would be cool playing a bench role as Kanter starts. No way in hell, IMO. And to be truthful, I wouldnt blame him. If I were Sap, and Kanter started ahead of me, I would freak out.

  11. #10
    Moderator Stoked's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Southern Utah
    Posts
    20,443
    Rep Power
    91
    Rep Level
    23229
    I wanted a bench Sap go Favors option.
    #BelieveInLindsey

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,426
    Rep Power
    18
    Rep Level
    766
    1280 radio had an NBA scout-ESPN guy, 4 pm Monday. He said that they will not really go anywhere with Sap as the PF.

    I tend to agree, he is just too small. He can look great at times but bigger guys can make him dissappear. And he lead the league in fouling.

  13. #12
    Senior Member franklin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Drinkin haterade, ridin the hate train through hateville
    Posts
    12,757
    Rep Power
    116
    Rep Level
    29759
    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    The most bizarre thing about this post is the idea that Kanter should be starting. (Kanter + Al??? Kanter hasn't been good so far this year)
    Quote Originally Posted by Growlor View Post
    Agreed.
    Why was there no option for starting Favors, or starting the big 3?
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoked View Post
    I wanted a bench Sap go Favors option.
    Gangnamit you illiterate crotch knuckles, the poll is not about who starts for ****s sake. The inner circle is trolling my thread!
    No Mediocrity

  14. #13
    Senior Member midnight_hwy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Boise, Idaho
    Posts
    756
    Rep Power
    14
    Rep Level
    329
    Quote Originally Posted by Stoked View Post
    I wanted a bench Sap go Favors option.
    This.
    That would be the one I would choose too.

  15. #14
    Premium Member Core4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Dante's inferno
    Posts
    14,299
    Rep Power
    99
    Rep Level
    24348
    Quote Originally Posted by franklin View Post
    Millsap's defense has been nothing short of awful so far this season. He has played a huge role in allowing penetrating wings to get easy layups (although the hate crowd will undoubtedly blame it on Jefferson, regardless).

    Who here would support Corbin benching him in favor of Kanter even though it would cost the Jazz plenty of games?
    1. You mean we'd lose MORE than 75% of our games?
    2. It's really a rhetorical question because we all know Corbin is never going to bench a veteran in order to play a 20-yr old.

    Fortunately, the play of Millsap is likely dropping his value. So look for KOC/Lindsey to make the bold move of only offering him a deal for 6 yrs/$72M.

  16. #15
    Senior Member pickledXgrandma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    the sugar hole
    Posts
    999
    Rep Power
    23
    Rep Level
    3112
    Quote Originally Posted by franklin View Post
    Millsap's defense has been nothing short of awful so far this season. He has played a huge role in allowing penetrating wings to get easy layups (although the hate crowd will undoubtedly blame it on Jefferson, regardless).

    Who here would support Corbin benching him in favor of Kanter even though it would cost the Jazz plenty of games?
    So it would cost us many games? Umm were 1 and 3, I don't think it will cost us any....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •