Is sometime's what I think when I watch Parsons play. But then you looks at the stats:
Hayward beats Parson's in points, FG%, and blocks while playing about 10 mintues LESS than him.
The point is sometimes the grass looks greener on the other side....if it looks that green its probably turf.
Go Jazz.
Last edited by Beantown; 11-18-2012 at 11:43 PM.
Gordon*
Parsons has always been a better shooter (that's by memory, not fact-finding).
........................................................................................................................ ...
what? Hayward is better than Parsons. dont need stats to tell me that.
stale-mate .. fact.
........................................................................................................................ ...
I agree but they are fairly close. I think it comes down to Hayward being a lottery pick and Parson's was a second rounder.Originally Posted by HeavenHarris
Parson's higher shooting percentage is attributed to that severe, untreatable case of acne he has. No one wants to get near him in the event one of them 'splodes.
Done. I hereby wish a case of bad acne upon Gordon Hayward. Excellent thought, J4e.
........................................................................................................................ ...
Because Gordan was born something else.
Yes, and Hayward has the skin of a 2 month old baby's bum.
...but parson's doesnt have a higher shooting percentage...
I'll bet $40 that Hayward has a 10x better career than Parsons.
You are cordially invited: www.bongofanz.com
i accept
Ill take that bet
That means Hayward has to average 10x the stats Parsons does.
Hack and Chris L, send me the $40 for safe keepings, then we will decide after both careers are over who the winner is.
You have my paypal info.
You are cordially invited: www.bongofanz.com
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote