Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 28 of 28
  1. #16
    Senior Member bovice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    503
    Rep Power
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by Catchall View Post
    Wow. That's an incredibly good haul for Pau Gasol who is old and sucks.
    True. But in his defense, it's hard to make the salaries match, dude makes 19 mil...

    I could totally see Amare + shump or a pick for Pau or something

  2. #17
    Senior Member spycam1's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    4,852
    Rep Power
    21
    This might actually happen; whenever the Lakers enter a slump, some team comes up with a trade that gets them back on top of the West.

    Not sure what the Bucks are thinking. The sense I get is that they're more interested in keeping Ellis than Jennings. But I really don't know. An Ellis/Jefferson swap is pretty even, so I think they would at least consider it.

    I doubt the Jazz do this, though. I'd be all up for finally beginning the youth movement, but I just don't think the FO is willing to risk being in the lottery.
    Quote Originally Posted by orangello View Post
    There is nothing flawed bout Spy. He knows. Don't question him again.
    Quote Originally Posted by nightmare3983 View Post
    Seriously, listen to spycam. He will not lead you astray.

  3. #18
    Senior Member mellow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Sec 3, T 15 S. R 6 E. SLB&M
    Posts
    3,422
    Rep Power
    26
    Some sportswriter on the Hoopshype twitter feed had posted these two 4-team trades involving the jazz. They might be realistic, but they are absolutley craptastic.

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=azfebpx

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b8d9dof Atleast we get Faried on this deal.
    May 21- Draft Lottery; June 27- NBA Draft; July 11- FA signing period begins; Oct 11- Preseaon game in Boise

  4. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    927
    Rep Power
    11
    In the first trade I think the Lakers would just get cut out and you'd end up with Gallinari and Wilson for Burks and Millsap.

  5. #20
    Senior Member orangello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Draft BPA
    Posts
    9,167
    Rep Power
    28
    Quote Originally Posted by mellow View Post
    Some sportswriter on the Hoopshype twitter feed had posted these two 4-team trades involving the jazz. They might be realistic, but they are absolutley craptastic.

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=azfebpx

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b8d9dof Atleast we get Faried on this deal.
    I like that the Jazz get Faried but that means there is still a log jam.

  6. #21
    Senior Member Jazz4ever's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,726
    Rep Power
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by mellow View Post
    Some sportswriter on the Hoopshype twitter feed had posted these two 4-team trades involving the jazz. They might be realistic, but they are absolutley craptastic.

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=azfebpx

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b8d9dof Atleast we get Faried on this deal.
    The second one would be a good deal for the Jazz. I think Faried is already as good as Millsap, only in his second year, and is super cheap for 3 more years. Gasol is overpaid but would be off the books by the time Kanter and Burks (if applicable) need extending.

  7. #22
    Senior Member franklin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    ri roun wit dat nina
    Posts
    8,192
    Rep Power
    43
    Quote Originally Posted by JJAS View Post
    The second one is infinitely better simply for the fact that we get rid of Raja and acquire the best sixth man in the NBA, Robert Sacre.

    Also, you could just trade Pau for Millsap and Jefferson if you wanted to cut out the middle man, unless you think you're making them too good.
    I added cheerleader just for you.

    I think Sap, Ellis, Foye & Bell are much more attractive than two bigs. LA's bench is downright awful and they won't go far without strengthening it significantly.


    Also, to those of you who don't want to strengthen LA: I don't care how good LA is when the Jazz are this bad/unwatchable.
    hOLA hoDIPO

    Quote Originally Posted by billyshelby View Post
    I'm not down on Hayward. But my opinion is both Burks and Bledsoe will be better players than he is if they're not already. It's that simple.
    Quote Originally Posted by Zulu View Post
    I Garan"DAMN"te Burks will be better than Victor!!

  8. #23
    Senior Member JJAS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    1,800
    Rep Power
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by franklin View Post
    I added cheerleader just for you.

    I think Sap, Ellis, Foye & Bell are much more attractive than two bigs. LA's bench is downright awful and they won't go far without strengthening it significantly.

    Also, to those of you who don't want to strengthen LA: I don't care how good LA is when the Jazz are this bad/unwatchable.
    I didn't dare to hope that you did. You're too good to me!

  9. #24
    Senior Member bovice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    503
    Rep Power
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by mellow View Post
    Some sportswriter on the Hoopshype twitter feed had posted these two 4-team trades involving the jazz. They might be realistic, but they are absolutley craptastic.

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=azfebpx

    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=b8d9dof Atleast we get Faried on this deal.

    We're the garbage team that's added just to make the salaries match up. Wilson Chandler has a decent contract, but he's always injured. And nobody wants Deshawn Stevenson...

    Both trades make the Lakers legitimate contenders....this dude has got to be a laker fan.

  10. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,628
    Rep Power
    15
    Quote Originally Posted by orangello View Post
    I like that the Jazz get Faried but that means there is still a log jam.
    At least it would be watchable.

  11. #26
    Senior Member jope's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Ogden City Limits
    Posts
    888
    Rep Power
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Revolution 9 View Post
    True because Sap would thrive in LA as a complementary player, which is really what he is.
    A great bench 6th man type.
    You really think Devin ebanks or Jamison's corpse would start over millsap?

  12.  

  13. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,169
    Rep Power
    13
    The Nuggets wouldn't do either of those deals.

  14. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,781
    Rep Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by cowhide View Post
    The Nuggets wouldn't do either of those deals.
    this

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •