Page 4 of 10 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 46 to 60 of 149
  1. #46
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Metro East, St. Louis
    Posts
    7,320
    Rep Power
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by JGolds View Post
    I love hearing self-taught BS. You could use that same rebuttal for saying the cons cancel out the pros cause they do.
    The difference being that, for those that contradict, the pros are based in reality, the cons in fantasy. There really have been different definitions of marriage by different cultures. There is no such thing as a traditional definition of marriage that transcends different cultures.
    http://lifetheuniverseandonebrow.blogspot.com/

    Isaiah 1:18 -- Come now, and let us reason together

    Any habitual action, such as eating or dressing, may be performed on the appropriate occasion, without any need of thought, and the same seems to be true of a painfully large proportion of our talk. -- Bertrand Russell

  2. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Metro East, St. Louis
    Posts
    7,320
    Rep Power
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Scat View Post
    Apples and oranges.
    Absolutely. You're not Ashley's dad, so it's definitely not at all alike.

    More seriously, when you take positions that are basically those taken by the homophobes, the results of which basically support the goals of the homophobes, the claim that you, individually, do have homophobic feelings is, at the very best, very meager consolation to the people experiencing discrimination. Your position offers credence and support to homophobia, whether you personally have such inclinations or not.
    http://lifetheuniverseandonebrow.blogspot.com/

    Isaiah 1:18 -- Come now, and let us reason together

    Any habitual action, such as eating or dressing, may be performed on the appropriate occasion, without any need of thought, and the same seems to be true of a painfully large proportion of our talk. -- Bertrand Russell

  3.  

     

  4. #48
    Oballin' BabyPeterzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,920
    Rep Power
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by Scat View Post
    Apples and oranges.
    "The experience of same-sex attraction is a complex reality for many people. The attraction itself is not a sin, but acting on it is. Even though individuals do not choose to have such attractions, they do choose how to respond to them." - via http://www.mormonsandgays.org/

    Kinda like race isn't a choice, eh?
    Freckle Liiiiiip.

  5. #49
    In pursuit of #9 PKM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    44,004
    Rep Power
    150
    So your point is we shouldn't act on our race?
    E.J. Wells vs. NAOS

    The confusion...

    ---
    Pre-season mock (7/13/13) - page 111

  6. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9,571
    Rep Power
    0
    Telling a gay person they can be gay all they want as long as they don't act on it is the same as telling a man he can be a man all he wants but his genitals will be removed. Tell me, men, sound like a fair bargain?

  7. #51
    Oballin' BabyPeterzz's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,920
    Rep Power
    25
    This site is a step in the right direction. Even though the language is still offensive and degrading, at least they moved off the "choice" stance. It's been upgraded to a disease.
    Freckle Liiiiiip.

  8. #52
    Senior Member Scat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,414
    Rep Power
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by BabyPeterzz View Post
    Kinda like race isn't a choice, eh?
    A gay man can choose not act on his desires. A black person has black skin regardless. Still apples to oranges.

  9. #53
    Senior Member Scat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,414
    Rep Power
    36
    Quote Originally Posted by Gameface View Post
    Telling a gay person they can be gay all they want as long as they don't act on it is the same as telling a man he can be a man all he wants but can't use his genitals. Tell me, men, sound like a fair bargain?
    Fixed.

  10. #54
    Senior Member The Thriller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On the Booz Cruise
    Posts
    8,694
    Rep Power
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by Bronco70 View Post
    The problem isn't official church policy.

    The problem is members who treat gays and gay issues in a dismissive or disdainful manner. Not very Christ-like, IMO.

    The church can talk about loving everyone until they're blue in the face - it's up to the membership to walk the walk, and generally they're doing a piss poor job.
    Have you noticed a difference in members' views on gay marriage from state to state?

    Or from age?

    Just curious, as Utah tends to have its' share of members who are VERY opinionated. Furthermore, the older members tend to be more stubborn and set in their ways... Sometimes very senile... I remember 1 in my family ward growing up who would attempt to predict the 2nd coming nearly every time he "bore testimony." Which... Was never a testimony. It was, Bro. x would stand up and prophesy to feel important for 10 mins.

    One of the main reasons why I can't stand family wards. Their testimony meetings (between the kids running around and parents not caring) are filled with a bunch of women merely wanting to praise their neighbors or cry their eyes out, fathers wanting to talk about travel stories/burn other members, and smartass kids trying to be funny. Say a quick 1-2 minute testimony and sit your butt down. Loved Brazil's simple testimony meetings.

    In my singles ward, we have 2 men (that I know of) who served missions and who are homosexual. I'll be honest, I'm pretty good friends with 1 of them and don't really see much prejudice against him. Fellow members don't talk bad about him behind his back. He isn't judged. If anything, most of us respect him, enjoy his comments and insights, and understand that whatever deal you're going through (be it unemployment, porn, loneliness, homosexuality, etc) sucks. It's our duty and opportunity to help lift others up.
    My singles ward, though it lacks bigtime in hotties (as I've stated before, we're like the Wizards or Bobcats of hotties. Not bueno) the men are way cool. There are some good hardworking men who help with anything.

    Though this homosexual friend of mine may feel comfortable and not judged in this singles ward, I have to imagine that a family ward with a bunch of old-timers might not be as understanding...

    Just curious as to what you've observed and also offering my 2cents....
    Corbin sucks.

  11. #55
    Senior Member franklin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Drinkin haterade, ridin the hate train through hateville
    Posts
    12,014
    Rep Power
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by BabyPeterzz View Post
    "The experience of same-sex attraction is a complex reality for many people. The attraction itself is not a sin, but acting on it is. Even though individuals do not choose to have such attractions, they do choose how to respond to them." - via http://www.mormonsandgays.org/

    Kinda like race isn't a choice, eh?
    Quote Originally Posted by Gameface View Post
    Telling a gay person they can be gay all they want as long as they don't act on it is the same as telling a man he can be a man all he wants but his genitals will be removed. Tell me, men, sound like a fair bargain?
    Or telling an alcoholic not to act on genetic conditioning. Or a sociopath to not murder. It's a very rational stance for a religious person to take, although that obviously has to be separated from political discourse.

    As a tangent, if we will ever be allowed to discuss homosexuality again in any meaningful manner then I'd like to ask quite a few questions to those who've read a bit into scientific studies. For now I guess I'm limited to asking if there is a distinguishing boundary between male-male pedophelia and male-male adult attraction like there is in heterosexual attraction. & no, I'm not a homophobe. You can kiss my ass if you think I'm asking out of anything besides pure curiosity.

  12. #56
    Senior Member franklin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Drinkin haterade, ridin the hate train through hateville
    Posts
    12,014
    Rep Power
    101
    Quote Originally Posted by Scat View Post
    Fixed.
    Huh. Never thought of it that way before. Like Catholic clergy from a religious perspective.

  13. #57
    Admininstrator colton's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    5,803
    Rep Power
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by One Brow View Post
    So, you'd be in favor of allowing the two men to marry, even if they were asexual? Or, do you limit asexual marriages to one man and one woman?
    Why did you answer my question with a question? Is this that Whose Line game?

    More seriously, you and I have already gone over this at least once in my memory, and maybe even twice. I find your arguments very uncompelling. You find my arguments very uncompelling. Enough said.
    The word you are looking for is very probably "complement", not "compliment". As in "Favors and Kanter will likely complement each other nicely". Although... depending on how impressive a given play is, they may compliment each other nicely as well.

  14. #58
    world's worst Bronco70's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    In the backseat
    Posts
    4,411
    Rep Power
    46
    Quote Originally Posted by The Thriller View Post
    Have you noticed a difference in members' views on gay marriage from state to state?
    I don't know specifically about GM, but in my experience non-Utah morms tend to be a little less rigid and unforgiving. There certainly are exceptions everywhere.

    Just curious, as Utah tends to have its' share of members who are VERY opinionated. Furthermore, the older members tend to be more stubborn and set in their ways... Sometimes very senile...
    I agree.

    In my singles ward, we have 2 men (that I know of) who served missions and who are homosexual. I'll be honest, I'm pretty good friends with 1 of them and don't really see much prejudice against him. Fellow members don't talk bad about him behind his back. He isn't judged. If anything, most of us respect him, enjoy his comments and insights, and understand that whatever deal you're going through (be it unemployment, porn, loneliness, homosexuality, etc) sucks. It's our duty and opportunity to help lift others up.
    That's the way it should be. To John Q. Mormon, whether or not someone is homosexual shouldn't matter at all. Additionally, whether or not someone is living a chaste lifestyle is, frankly, none of your/my business (unless you are that person's ecclesiastical leader)

  15. #59
    In Pursuit of #PKM UGLI baby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    гег
    Posts
    28,892
    Rep Power
    137
    In my experience, just because someone is Mormon doesn't necessarily mean they are gay.
    #Hope4Hoiberg #OrOllie

  16. #60
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Metro East, St. Louis
    Posts
    7,320
    Rep Power
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Scat View Post
    A gay man can choose not act on his desires.
    A black man/woman who falls in love with a white woman/man can choose not to act on their desires.

    Apples and apples.
    http://lifetheuniverseandonebrow.blogspot.com/

    Isaiah 1:18 -- Come now, and let us reason together

    Any habitual action, such as eating or dressing, may be performed on the appropriate occasion, without any need of thought, and the same seems to be true of a painfully large proportion of our talk. -- Bertrand Russell

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •