Or something like "sample size".
So how did i do explaining your side of the arguement for ya?
Chart it if you want. But we don't run a starter offense and a backup offense.
Now when you say that nothing would change if kanter or favors started instead of al that is total guessing and speculation.
I always take the side of fact over guessing. Sorry
Also there is a huge change to the offense you are forgetting. Kanter and favors are much more mobile so there is alot more transition offense. And they are better defensively causing turnovers and tough shots leading to even more transition.
Plus right now kanter and favors are used similar to AL and that COULD be due to that fact that it is difficult for an inexperienced coach and young bench to change the offense up for the non big al lineups.
Is it not possible that with al gone and favors or kanter in his place that ty could eventually change the offense to something more pick and roll focused or something?
Or do think there is some kind of rule that no matter the personnell the offense must go through the low post no matter what?
Oh wait you said yourself that they used paul millsap against the lakers in a much different way and totally changed the offense to the tune of 117 pts on the road.... so there is a chance things could change without big Al.
Thanks for that insight billy. I look forward to next year even more now!
"I'm a moron for thinking the Browns could even sniff 10 wins in a division where the other three teams (two of whom almost always make the playoffs) made the post-season last year. Gyp Rosetti's thee God of football knowledge." - Brown Notes