Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 66

Thread: Mo's injury

  1. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,581
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NAOS View Post
    Why shouldn't we want both? I mean, we have zero PGs right now. Bledsoe and Mo can slide over.
    Surely you jest.

  2. #17
    Senior Member NUMBERICA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    13,340
    Total Rep Points
    15639
    Rep Adjustment Power
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by NAOS View Post
    Why shouldn't we want both? I mean, we have zero PGs right now. Bledsoe and Mo can slide over.
    Yeah. Jazz need SOMETHING they could conceivably move forward with, but people are almost making Bledsoe out to be the next CP3 around here or something. Maybe he gets better.

    I'm just going to hope something happens in the draft because I don't know a PG out there that's both available enough and fits the Jazz's needs enough.
    Quote Originally Posted by every forum dreg
    I think he can play SF

  3. #18
    Senior Member NUMBERICA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    13,340
    Total Rep Points
    15639
    Rep Adjustment Power
    70
    Bottom line, I like players that provide their most basic positional role first. I like point guards to be floor-generals that know the entire playbook in their sleep and know how to make things happen for their team. Sometimes, those players can also score well, or rebound well, or defend well. But without that first part, my attention depletes really, really fast.

    For the record, some PGs are smarter in how they operate a team than assuming they should always have the ball and must rack up assists. Chauncey Billups is a shining example of this, as is Tony Parker to a degree. I don't see that in Bledsoe, I see a kid with awe-inspiring power, speed, length, and an emerging ability to score but basically a kid that runs out there and crashes around and things happen sometimes. I'm not looking for that.
    Quote Originally Posted by every forum dreg
    I think he can play SF

  4. #19
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,581
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Bledsoe's so impressive he's 57th in assists per 48 and 157th in A:TO ratio (1.57) and this is who we want running our team?

  5. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,781
    Total Rep Points
    4567
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyp Rosetti View Post
    Surely you jest.
    Surely not, skipper.

  6.  

     

  7. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,581
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NAOS View Post
    Surely not, skipper.
    Then you need to have your head examined.

  8. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,781
    Total Rep Points
    4567
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    You're right we already have too many PGs and SGs under contract for next year.

  9. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,581
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NAOS View Post
    You're right we already have too many PGs and SGs under contract for next year.
    Sorry, I'm simply not down with signing vets to keep our heads above water in an attempt to clear .500 and pump our fists in the air.

    There's a reason no one wants Calderon. There's also a reason having too many players who can play is a problem. Especially for a moron like Corbin.

  10. #24
    Senior Member Brown Notes's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    2,367
    Total Rep Points
    1333
    Rep Adjustment Power
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyp Rosetti View Post
    Sorry, I'm simply not down with signing vets to keep our heads above water in an attempt to clear .500 and pump our fists in the air.

    There's a reason no one wants Calderon. There's also a reason having too many players who can play is a problem.
    Especially for a moron like Corbin.
    Contradictions are a special gift for you. Either the guy can play, and has a market, or can't and isn't a "problem" according to even more ridiculous logic. Seriously, there must be some fellowship you can join that honors stupidity.
    "I'm a moron for thinking the Browns could even sniff 10 wins in a division where the other three teams (two of whom almost always make the playoffs) made the post-season last year. Gyp Rosetti's thee God of football knowledge." - Brown Notes

  11. #25
    Senior Member IBProfane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    553
    Total Rep Points
    439
    Rep Adjustment Power
    17
    I'm not saying Bledsoe is a cure-all to everything that ails the team, but he is a very good defender, has ridiculous speed/quickness, and can get into the lane at will. Calderon is lights year better than Bledsoe at distributing and shooting the ball, but he's an awful defender. He will get eaten up by Walker, Knight, Lawson, Bledsoe and all the other young points in the league. I would love to see a Bledsoe, Burks, Hayward, Favors, Kanter starting 5. I think we would murder teams defensively, in turn we'd get out and run the ball down other teams throats.

  12. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,581
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Brown Notes View Post
    Contradictions are a special gift for you. Either the guy can play, and has a market, or can't and isn't a "problem" according to even more ridiculous logic. Seriously, there must be some fellowship you can join that honors stupidity.
    There's a difference between being able to play in this league and being able to be a strong starter on a team that can win a couple playoff series. Ya know, if that's your thing.

  13. #27
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,781
    Total Rep Points
    4567
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyp Rosetti View Post
    Sorry, I'm simply not down with signing vets to keep our heads above water in an attempt to clear .500 and pump our fists in the air.

    There's a reason no one wants Calderon. There's also a reason having too many players who can play is a problem. Especially for a moron like Corbin.
    I wasn't talking about Jose aceface. I said go get Bledsoe and Teague.

  14. #28
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,581
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by NAOS View Post
    I wasn't talking about Jose aceface. I said go get Bledsoe and Teague.
    You obviously missed the part about having too many players who can play.

  15. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,781
    Total Rep Points
    4567
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyp Rosetti View Post
    Ditto. The love for Bledsoe on this board is absurd. If we're going after someone, please let it be Teague in the off-season.
    To which I replied
    Quote Originally Posted by NAOS View Post
    Why shouldn't we want both? I mean, we have zero PGs right now. Bledsoe and Mo can slide over.
    but I did mention getting Jose in another post.

  16. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,781
    Total Rep Points
    4567
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyp Rosetti View Post
    You obviously missed the part about having too many players who can play.
    You mean when Tinsley, Mo, Foye, and Watson are no longer under contract?

    You mean these guys here that we would have to surrender in any trade. Get your **** lined up, braugh.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •