Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 29
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,835
    Rep Power
    17

    Starting lineup with Mo, and Marvin out.

    With the Williams out we have an excuse to experiment with the starting lineup. What I'd like to see happen is this

    Foye. Tinsley
    Burks. Hayward. Murphy (has been recalled)
    Hayward. Carroll
    Favors. Millsap
    Al. Kanter

    Foye, Burks, and Hayward can be the pg by comity. Foye is the shooter, Burks is quick, and gets to the hoop well, while Hayward doesn't do these things on an elite level but very well, and the best passer of the three. They would take pressure off each other and mesh well. The reason I have Sap on the second unit is for some offense for that lineup, but Ty probably won't do that.

    Thoughts....

  2. #2
    Senior Member LunaticWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    922
    Rep Power
    13
    No. That lineup has not proven itself yet.

    We need to try it again in Atlanta, but not start it.
    "The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." - George Washington

  3. #3
    Senior Member bovice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    511
    Rep Power
    6
    Initially I think it will be Tinsley/Foye/Hayward/Milsap/Jefferson

    Marvin is only out 3 games, so there's a possibility we might not see a change from that. But if there is, I would hope that it's what the OP posted.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Sneakers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,933
    Rep Power
    15
    Carroll's gonna start.
    Quote Originally Posted by trigg3r View Post
    DeMarre showed way too much hustle making other players look bad. Corbin couldn't have that, so he demoted him to ESA janitor. Instead of hustling for rebounds and steals, he is busy mopping floors and switching out urinal cakes.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Ogden
    Posts
    190
    Rep Power
    4
    Carrol is going to start for sure. Corbin's still like,"this ***** on the back of the bench is gonna stay here until he bows to me and kisses my feet." Burks is like, well f that I'll wait to blow up until you are fired..

  6. #6
    Senior Member fishonjazz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    K-TOWN
    Posts
    3,632
    Rep Power
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by Thee jazz fan View Post
    With the Williams out we have an excuse to experiment with the starting lineup. What I'd like to see happen is this

    Foye. Tinsley
    Burks. Hayward. Murphy (has been recalled)
    Hayward. Carroll
    Favors. Millsap
    Al. Kanter

    Foye, Burks, and Hayward can be the pg by comity. Foye is the shooter, Burks is quick, and gets to the hoop well, while Hayward doesn't do these things on an elite level but very well, and the best passer of the three. They would take pressure off each other and mesh well. The reason I have Sap on the second unit is for some offense for that lineup, but Ty probably won't do that.

    Thoughts....
    I love your lineup, of course so do most jazzfanz... but there is no way in hell corbin would actually do something like that.
    I guarantee that the lineup will be tinsley, foye, carroll, millsap, and jeffy.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    5,835
    Rep Power
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by fishonjazz View Post
    I love your lineup, of course so do most jazzfanz... but there is no way in hell corbin would actually do something like that.
    I guarantee that the lineup will be tinsley, foye, carroll, millsap, and jeffy.
    I'll freak out like a 16 year old drama Queen if that's Ty's lineup.

  8. #8
    Senior Member gregbroncs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Here! Wait is this a roll call?
    Posts
    3,004
    Rep Power
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by Thee jazz fan View Post
    I'll freak out like a 16 year old drama Queen if that's Ty's lineup.
    Better start practicing because I give it 80% chance that his lineup is the one that gets chosen.
    Just say no to Mo, Millsap, Jefferson and Ty. All right at least the 1st 3. We are probably stuck with the worst of the group.

  9. #9
    Senior Member gregbroncs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Here! Wait is this a roll call?
    Posts
    3,004
    Rep Power
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaticWolf View Post
    No. That lineup has not proven itself yet.

    We need to try it again in Atlanta, but not start it.
    We don't have a proven linuep.


    Unless you count the starters as:
    Proven to not be good enough to lead in the 1st quarter very often.
    Or proven to be the worst defensive lineup we have.
    How about Proven to be boring and terrible.


    Is that what you mean by proven?
    Just say no to Mo, Millsap, Jefferson and Ty. All right at least the 1st 3. We are probably stuck with the worst of the group.

  10. #10
    Senior Member The Fresh Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Right here, RIGHT NOW!
    Posts
    1,363
    Rep Power
    14
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaticWolf View Post
    No. That lineup has not proven itself yet.

    We need to try it again in Atlanta, but not start it.
    Say hello to Mr. Whether we're playing .250 ball or championship ball, I'll always be optimistic about my teams decisions.... even if they evidently suck.
    Errrrrr,



    AKA. the thread killer.

    #thethreadkiller

  11.  

  12. #11
    Moderator Revolution 9's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Vilseck, Germany
    Posts
    5,697
    Rep Power
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaticWolf View Post
    No. That lineup has not proven itself yet.

    We need to try it again in Atlanta, but not start it.

    I've been screaming for this line up all along. I'm just glad we got to see it when the game was on the line.
    If it was good enough for the end of the Dallas game why not roll with it? Either way it's good to see Corbin try
    these things.

    I also loved the Favors defensive sub late in the Dallas game.
    A-Train - "I would be happy with the Jazz if they picked Schroeder at #14 over Larkin"

  13. #12
    Senior Member orangello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Draft BPA
    Posts
    9,610
    Rep Power
    30
    I actually don't want Burks and Hayward starting if Big Al will be there. They seem to move the ball better with the bench and then the force the starters to move the ball once Favors and Kanter have played 5 minutes and need to be benched again.
    PKM, aka Tiny Hands................

  14. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    2,278
    Rep Power
    15
    Please no Foye at PG. Everything else I like.

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,119
    Rep Power
    12
    Isn't Jeremy going to get some love?

  16. #15
    Senior Member candrew's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Movin' on Up!
    Posts
    2,790
    Rep Power
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by orangello View Post
    I actually don't want Burks and Hayward starting if Big Al will be there. They seem to move the ball better with the bench and then the force the starters to move the ball once Favors and Kanter have played 5 minutes and need to be benched again.
    I agree. The Jazz are two completely different offenses with Jefferson in or out of the game. Notice how Tinsley's Assists/36 have plummeted since he became a starter.

    While Carroll starting is not ideal - at this point the impact of starting Hayward/Burks is minor while the impact of removing them from the second team is major.
    Last edited by candrew; 01-09-2013 at 12:30 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •