Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 29 of 29
  1. #16
    Senior Member gregbroncs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Here! Wait is this a roll call?
    Posts
    3,923
    Total Rep Points
    4088
    Rep Adjustment Power
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by homeytennis View Post
    Isn't Jeremy going to get some love?
    Why? He has not shown to be particularly good at anything but dunking the ball. Can't defend, Can't shoot, and Can't dribble. He's the very definition of a tweener. Body of a SF, without any of the skills required to play that position.
    Welcome aboard Snyder, Exum and Hood. Here is to hoping this season is more entertaining than the last 3.

  2. #17
    Senior Member gregbroncs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Here! Wait is this a roll call?
    Posts
    3,923
    Total Rep Points
    4088
    Rep Adjustment Power
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by cowhide View Post
    Please no Foye at PG. Everything else I like.
    At this point you can't believe it would be worse than Tinsley or Watson.
    Welcome aboard Snyder, Exum and Hood. Here is to hoping this season is more entertaining than the last 3.

  3.  

     

  4. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,082
    Total Rep Points
    273
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Demarre gets the start as predicted in this thread.

    When will Ty start Burks, Hayward, Favors & Kanter ?

    The 2nd unit will win this game but time to show respect to these guys or they will leave as soon as they can

  5. #19
    Senior Member orangello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Draft BPA
    Posts
    13,729
    Total Rep Points
    16443
    Rep Adjustment Power
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by udflyer View Post
    Demarre gets the start as predicted in this thread.

    When will Ty start Burks, Hayward, Favors & Kanter ?

    The 2nd unit will win this game but time to show respect to these guys or they will leave as soon as they can
    I might be in the minority on this but I'm glad that Gtime and Burks are not starting. They play etter with the other bench players.
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggs View Post
    So I was very mad about the game, but I wasn't going to vent here, because you guys all feel the same way. However, Ty's postgame interview got my blood boiling. On why he let Trey and Gordon play while having bad games, "You gotta let them battle through it because that's what you gotta do." Really are you kidding me. You have to balls to say that when you pulled Alec after 16 minutes against LAC and Kanter got 19 minutes toinght?

  6. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    1,082
    Total Rep Points
    273
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by orangello View Post
    I might be in the minority on this but I'm glad that Gtime and Burks are not starting. They play etter with the other bench players.
    Agree completely. My point is our bench and starters need to flip flop. At the end of the day, players do care if they start or not, despite what they say publicly

  7. #21
    Senior Member orangello's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Draft BPA
    Posts
    13,729
    Total Rep Points
    16443
    Rep Adjustment Power
    69
    Quote Originally Posted by udflyer View Post
    Agree completely. My point is our bench and starters need to flip flop. At the end of the day, players do care if they start or not, despite what they say publicly
    Agreed. They need to flip flop but it is not going to happen unless injury or trade comes about.
    Quote Originally Posted by Biggs View Post
    So I was very mad about the game, but I wasn't going to vent here, because you guys all feel the same way. However, Ty's postgame interview got my blood boiling. On why he let Trey and Gordon play while having bad games, "You gotta let them battle through it because that's what you gotta do." Really are you kidding me. You have to balls to say that when you pulled Alec after 16 minutes against LAC and Kanter got 19 minutes toinght?

  8. #22
    Senior Member sojodave's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    In Front Of My 100" Screen
    Posts
    1,809
    Total Rep Points
    2222
    Rep Adjustment Power
    22
    I think it's pretty clear that Ty is prejudice. He has a bad case of kiddiephobia. He hates to start the kiddies, but prays they bail them out after the starters stink up the gym.

  9. #23
    Senior Member Thee jazz fan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    9,377
    Total Rep Points
    7365
    Rep Adjustment Power
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaticWolf View Post
    No. That lineup has not proven itself yet.

    We need to try it again in Atlanta, but not start it.
    Your right about the Starters proving they aren't that good

  10. #24
    I Like Warm Hugs Stifle Tower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Getting ready to scare the kiddies
    Posts
    15,021
    Total Rep Points
    27293
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by udflyer View Post
    Demarre gets the start as predicted in this thread.

    When will Ty start Burks, Hayward, Favors & Kanter ?

    The 2nd unit will win this game but time to show respect to these guys or they will leave as soon as they can
    Well, they are getting time together...as the 2nd unit. I'm ok with that. As many have said, when Jefferson is in the game, there is no ball movement. If we can't get rid of Al, then the next best solution is to have the players of the future grow together as a unit. What I do like is that Burks is finally getting a little playing time.

  11. #25
    Senior Member LunaticWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,098
    Total Rep Points
    489
    Rep Adjustment Power
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by gregbroncs View Post
    We don't have a proven linuep.
    There's a difference between making a change to the lineup, and not having a point guard on the floor.

    Quote Originally Posted by The Fresh Prince View Post
    Say hello to Mr. Whether we're playing .250 ball or championship ball, I'll always be optimistic about my teams decisions.... even if they evidently suck.
    Great. Then you can be Mr. I'll complain about anything and everything, always demanding that the flavor of the month start, even if they are as ****ty as Fesenko.

    Quote Originally Posted by Revolution 9 View Post
    I've been screaming for this line up all along. I'm just glad we got to see it when the game was on the line.
    If it was good enough for the end of the Dallas game why not roll with it? Either way it's good to see Corbin try
    these things.

    I also loved the Favors defensive sub late in the Dallas game.
    I hope the lineup can work, but it needs to be shown to be effective against multiple teams before we start it and play it the majority of the game.
    "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired, signifies in the final sense a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed." - Dwight D. Eisenhower

  12. #26
    Senior Member gregbroncs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Here! Wait is this a roll call?
    Posts
    3,923
    Total Rep Points
    4088
    Rep Adjustment Power
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaticWolf View Post
    There's a difference between making a change to the lineup, and not having a point guard on the floor.

    Great. Then you can be Mr. I'll complain about anything and everything, always demanding that the flavor of the month start, even if they are as ****ty as Fesenko.

    I hope the lineup can work, but it needs to be shown to be effective against multiple teams before we start it and play it the majority of the game.
    Well the offense looked better this game with Burks at PG than it really ever does with Tinsley or Watson. It was against the Bobcats. But it still looked better then when the other 2 were on the floor.

    And again what lineup have we used this season that has consistently shown to be effective? It sure as **** is not our starting lineup.
    Welcome aboard Snyder, Exum and Hood. Here is to hoping this season is more entertaining than the last 3.

  13. #27
    Senior Member Purch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    455
    Total Rep Points
    364
    Rep Adjustment Power
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by gregbroncs View Post
    Well the offense looked better this game with Burks at PG than it really ever does with Tinsley or Watson. It was against the Bobcats. But it still looked better then when the other 2 were on the floor.

    And again what lineup have we used this season that has consistently shown to be effective? It sure as **** is not our starting lineup.
    What Tinsley ran the offense beautifuly in the 1st half, he got everyone good looks.

    It was Watson that gave up the big lead.

  14. #28
    Senior Member gregbroncs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Here! Wait is this a roll call?
    Posts
    3,923
    Total Rep Points
    4088
    Rep Adjustment Power
    30
    Quote Originally Posted by Purch View Post
    What Tinsley ran the offense beautifuly in the 1st half, he got everyone good looks.

    It was Watson that gave up the big lead.
    Was not nearly as good in the 2nd half. I am hoping that Burks proves to be a decent PG because the 2 guys we have right now are terrible.
    Welcome aboard Snyder, Exum and Hood. Here is to hoping this season is more entertaining than the last 3.

  15. #29
    Senior Member The Fresh Prince's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Downtown talking to Toure Murry!
    Posts
    3,582
    Total Rep Points
    6984
    Rep Adjustment Power
    40
    Quote Originally Posted by LunaticWolf View Post
    There's a difference between making a change to the lineup, and not having a point guard on the floor.

    Great. Then you can be Mr. I'll complain about anything and everything, always demanding that the flavor of the month start, even if they are as ****ty as Fesenko.

    I hope the lineup can work, but it needs to be shown to be effective against multiple teams before we start it and play it the majority of the game.
    Marvin Williams is not as bad or as ***ty as Fesenko.

    I could eat a peach for hours.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •