Why? He has not shown to be particularly good at anything but dunking the ball. Can't defend, Can't shoot, and Can't dribble. He's the very definition of a tweener. Body of a SF, without any of the skills required to play that position.Originally Posted by homeytennis
Just say no to Mo, Millsap, Jefferson and Ty. All right at least the 1st 3. We are probably stuck with the worst of the group.
At this point you can't believe it would be worse than Tinsley or Watson.
Just say no to Mo, Millsap, Jefferson and Ty. All right at least the 1st 3. We are probably stuck with the worst of the group.
Demarre gets the start as predicted in this thread.
When will Ty start Burks, Hayward, Favors & Kanter ?
The 2nd unit will win this game but time to show respect to these guys or they will leave as soon as they can
I might be in the minority on this but I'm glad that Gtime and Burks are not starting. They play etter with the other bench players.
PKM, aka Tiny Hands................
Agree completely. My point is our bench and starters need to flip flop. At the end of the day, players do care if they start or not, despite what they say publicly
Agreed. They need to flip flop but it is not going to happen unless injury or trade comes about.
PKM, aka Tiny Hands................
I think it's pretty clear that Ty is prejudice. He has a bad case of kiddiephobia. He hates to start the kiddies, but prays they bail them out after the starters stink up the gym.
Your right about the Starters proving they aren't that good
Well, they are getting time together...as the 2nd unit. I'm ok with that. As many have said, when Jefferson is in the game, there is no ball movement. If we can't get rid of Al, then the next best solution is to have the players of the future grow together as a unit. What I do like is that Burks is finally getting a little playing time.
When one door closes, another doesn't open....instead, I find myself being locked in a room with padded walls and no windows.
There's a difference between making a change to the lineup, and not having a point guard on the floor.
Great. Then you can be Mr. I'll complain about anything and everything, always demanding that the flavor of the month start, even if they are as ****ty as Fesenko.
I hope the lineup can work, but it needs to be shown to be effective against multiple teams before we start it and play it the majority of the game.
"The very atmosphere of firearms anywhere and everywhere restrains evil interference - they deserve a place of honor with all that's good." - George Washington
Well the offense looked better this game with Burks at PG than it really ever does with Tinsley or Watson. It was against the Bobcats. But it still looked better then when the other 2 were on the floor.
And again what lineup have we used this season that has consistently shown to be effective? It sure as **** is not our starting lineup.
Just say no to Mo, Millsap, Jefferson and Ty. All right at least the 1st 3. We are probably stuck with the worst of the group.
What Tinsley ran the offense beautifuly in the 1st half, he got everyone good looks.
It was Watson that gave up the big lead.
Was not nearly as good in the 2nd half. I am hoping that Burks proves to be a decent PG because the 2 guys we have right now are terrible.
Just say no to Mo, Millsap, Jefferson and Ty. All right at least the 1st 3. We are probably stuck with the worst of the group.
Marvin Williams is not as bad or as ***ty as Fesenko.
Errrrrr,
AKA. the thread killer.
#thethreadkiller
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote