I'm watching Stan Van Gundy right now on CNN discussing the ****ing awful Grammy's. WTF?
I'm watching Stan Van Gundy right now on CNN discussing the ****ing awful Grammy's. WTF?
With each passing game, the list gets shorter and shorter...
Doc Rivers did not win this game because of coaching prowess. He won it because he has two HOFs on his squad.
Not sure what role he played in drawing up several Paul Pierce isos, or Kevin Garnett's unbelievable P&R-busting ability.
He played a role in double teaming Big Al, switching to a zone, and fouling at the end of the game. Are you arguing Corbing is better?
*Two HOFers that are shells of their former selves, no PG, and a cobbled together roster of non-sense.
Playing well is priority #1 and nothing outside of that is really even close. If you're hoping someone else ****s up, then you don't deserve the break.
Oh, and the little trick(s) he played to get his players more rest.
The only coach he's better than is... maybe Ostertag if he ever decided to coach.
Playing well is priority #1 and nothing outside of that is really even close. If you're hoping someone else ****s up, then you don't deserve the break.
Anyway, the Celtics are not that good, and Doc Rivers isn't the best coach in the NBA, but saying he's a better coach than Ty is not a lofty compliment either.
Playing well is priority #1 and nothing outside of that is really even close. If you're hoping someone else ****s up, then you don't deserve the break.
Trolls are frustrating. That's the long and the short of it. And you know everything about it. But good show.
Playing well is priority #1 and nothing outside of that is really even close. If you're hoping someone else ****s up, then you don't deserve the break.
You're overthinking this, Doc Rivers may not be on par with Popovich and Phil Jackson when it comes to game planning and in-game adjustments, but at least he knows how to put his best players in the starting lineup. Something our coach still hasn't figured out after 2.5 seasons...