Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Interesting Locke stats

  1. #1
    Senior Member Weezur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,316
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    4739
    Rep Adjustment Power
    32

    Interesting Locke stats

    Since I want to talk about anything but the game last night, here are some really interesting stats from Locke about the best and worst 2 and 3 man groups.
    Guess who's name is at the top of the 'best of' list and who is the bottom of the 'worst of' list.

    3 BEST 2 MAN GROUPS
    1. Alec Burks/Paul Millsap
    2. Alec Burks/Al Jefferson
    3. Gordon Hayward/Jamaal Tinsley

    3 WORST 2 MAN GROUPS
    1. Earl Watson/ Gordon Hayward
    2. Earl Watson/Derrick Favors
    3. Alec Burks/Derrick Favors

    3 BEST OFFENSIVE 2 MAN GROUPS
    1. Alec Burks/Al Jefferson
    2. Alec Burks/Paul Millsap
    3. Alec Burks/Randy Foye
    Note: This is really one 5 man group that has played well with Gordon Hayward as well.

    3 WORST OFFENSIVE 2 MAN GROUPS
    1. Alec Burks/Derrick Favors
    2. Earl Watson/Derrick Favors
    3. Earl Watson/Gordon Hayward

    3 BEST DEFENSVIE 2 MAN GROUPS
    1. Alec Burks/Paul Millsap
    2. DeMarre Carroll/Enes Kanter
    3. Jamaal Tinsley/Gordon Hayward

    3 WORST DEFENSIVE 2 MAN GROUPS
    1. Earl Watson/Al Jefferson
    2. Derrick Favors/Al Jefferson
    3. Mo Williams/Derrick Favors
    4. Randy Foye/Gordon Hayward

    Here are a few other notes. Looking at just the top 30 most used 2 man groups all having played at least 300 minutes together might have more of a signal and less noise

    BEST OVERALL Tinsley/Hawyard then Carroll/Kanter then Gordon/Marvin tied with Carroll/Hayward
    WORST OVERALL: Watson/Hayward and Watson/Favors
    BEST OFFENSE: Tinsley/Hayward then Hayward/Jefferson and Hayward/Milsap
    WORST OFFENSE: Watson/Favors and Watson Hayward then Hayward/Favors
    BEST DEFENSE: Carroll/Kanter and Tinsley/Hayward then Hayward/Kanter
    WORST DEFENSE: Favors/Jefferson then Mo/Foye and Foye/Jefferson
    Discuss


  2. #2
    Senior Member dipship31's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    3741
    Rep Adjustment Power
    35
    Favors not in any of the best categories??

    TRADE THIS WORTHLESS BUM

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Houston, Tx
    Posts
    2,841
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    2997
    Rep Adjustment Power
    32
    Is Burks great because he only gets minutes when he is playing well?
    The pen is mightier than the sword. I keep the sword for the day I run out of ink. - Unknown

    People demand freedom of speech to make up for the freedom of thought which they avoid. - Soren Kierkegaard

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    11,250
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    7119
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    burks has small sample size

  5. #5
    Senior Member Weezur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,316
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    4739
    Rep Adjustment Power
    32
    Burks does have a small sample size. Good job Dutch, you're smarter than Locke.

    TipOff is interesting too.
    I know Locke can't outright say that Corbin is a bad coach if he believes it but TipOff today was as close to him saying coach made a bad move as it has been all year.
    The bad move was Foye on Harden.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Hack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    In my office
    Posts
    15,474
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    48644
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    More stupid Locke stats

  7. #7
    Senior Member NAOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Jazz Forum
    Posts
    11,684
    Mentioned
    46 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    22017
    Rep Adjustment Power
    98
    Quote Originally Posted by Weezur View Post
    The bad move was Foye on _________.
    Agreed.
    [size/HUGE] RUDY [/size]
    anti-cakk bakking... from the outset. #cakks&pies
    3-wing lineups: NO COMMENT. Jazz need to make a trade: YES
    OFFSEASON ACQUISITION TARGET: KENT BAZEMORE (take 2)

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,255
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    929
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    So what stats did Locke cherrypick to come up with this information?

  9. #9
    Senior Member dipship31's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,863
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    3741
    Rep Adjustment Power
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by Weezur View Post
    The bad move was Foye on Harden.
    So 4 days ago Ty puts Foye up against Kobe and last night up against Harden.......

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    499
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    753
    Rep Adjustment Power
    25
    Just listen to Locke talk with DJ and PK and you'll see he's a stupid homer. Talks about how Golden State is the same as Utah in terms of building a team. But then says Golden State has Steph Curry, and that's why they're better. Holy **** Steph Curry wouldn't play if Ty had him.

  11. #11
    Premium Member bluenote's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    SLC->AA->SLC
    Posts
    1,144
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    2257
    Rep Adjustment Power
    29
    One of the most solid (and fun to watch) lineups the Jazz ran this year was Burks, Foye, Jefferson, Millsap and Hayward. Too bad they just ran it for a couple games.

  12. #12
    All Around Nice Guy colton's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    8,248
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    18271
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by bluenote View Post
    One of the most solid (and fun to watch) lineups the Jazz ran this year was Burks, Foye, Jefferson, Millsap and Hayward. Too bad they just ran it for a couple games.
    That's lineup #20 on this site: http://www.82games.com/1213/1213UTA2.HTM

    They have only run it for 19.6 total minutes all season. But they outscored the opponents by a whopping 26 pts in those 19.6 minutes. (Outscoring your opponent by more than a pt per minute is phenomenal.)
    "He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the Lord require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?" --Micah 6:8
    :-)

  13. #13
    Senior Member Weezur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Posts
    4,316
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    4739
    Rep Adjustment Power
    32
    Quote Originally Posted by colton View Post
    That's lineup #20 on this site: http://www.82games.com/1213/1213UTA2.HTM

    They have only run it for 19.6 total minutes all season. But they outscored the opponents by a whopping 26 pts in those 19.6 minutes. (Outscoring your opponent by more than a pt per minute is phenomenal.)
    How about Burks, Foye, Hayward, Jefferson, Favors? Does that lineup work as well?

  14. #14
    Senior Member Ellipse's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    2,663
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    3259
    Rep Adjustment Power
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by Hack View Post
    More stupid Locke stats
    Perhaps, but I noticed that Watson was mentioned frequently on the "worst" pairings and never on the "best" pairings -- which certainly backs my observations of Watson.

    I believe that Watson is the reason Kanter can't get minutes, because Corbin judges Kanter's play by how well the "bench" is doing and Watson drags everyone down.

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,425
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Hack View Post
    More stupid Locke stats
    This. Sadly, ball is not played two-on-two and Burks does not receive any sort of meaningful minutes for me to deduce **** from this. And that's what all this is. A pile of deuce.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are a community of Utah JazzFanz that are passionate about our team. We celebrate the highs that come with last second heroics and (some of us) cry in defeat. Welcome to our community. Be respectful of others and join in to the conversation...
Join us