Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 87
  1. #31
    Senior Member pickledXgrandma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    the sugar hole
    Posts
    999
    Total Rep Points
    3112
    Rep Adjustment Power
    24
    Hayward for Jermaine Oneal. We get a solid veteran that can't really contribute to winning or a winning attitude but its another big we can keep in front of our inexperience worthless young uns.

  2. #32
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    13
    Total Rep Points
    10
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=aftz4kr

    Thats what I would do. Milsap and Jefferson for Dudley, Gortat and Dragic.
    Another version would be Jefferson for Dudley and Dragic straight up, which I actually like better since that clears room for Kanter and Favors if you don't add a big back in (Gortat).

  3. #33
    Senior Member pkmag2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    299
    Total Rep Points
    79
    Rep Adjustment Power
    16
    Boo. Hayward stAys!

  4. #34
    Admininstrator colton's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    6,451
    Total Rep Points
    12213
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by zman1527 View Post
    Gortat, or any other big, is the LAST thing we need. We don't need to keep the logjam going/excuse to not play favors and kanter.

    Would love to get Dragic.
    Having 3-bigs that can play is not a logjam. Are you serious?
    Unless the Jazz also trade Millsap, there would still be four bigs. I think that's what zman was talking about.
    "Giving to the poor is an essential part of Christian morality. I do not believe one can settle how much we ought to give. I’m afraid the only safe rule is to give more than we can spare... If our charities do not at all pinch or hamper us, I should say they are too small. There ought to be things that we’d like to do but cannot do because our charitable expenditure excludes them." --C.S. Lewis
    :-)

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Posts
    252
    Total Rep Points
    583
    Rep Adjustment Power
    18
    Quote Originally Posted by colton View Post
    Unless the Jazz also trade Millsap, there would still be four bigs. I think that's what zman was talking about.
    Yeah, but for how long? Getting Gortat would pretty much spell the definite end for Millsap in Utah. Kanter/Favors/Gortat would be a very nice trio for next season.

  6. #36
    Senior Member NUMBERICA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    13,464
    Total Rep Points
    16397
    Rep Adjustment Power
    73
    Quote Originally Posted by colton View Post
    Unless the Jazz also trade Millsap, there would still be four bigs. I think that's what zman was talking about.
    No, that's actually what I was talking about in the very post he quoted:

    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    Al for Gortat is something I'd be very into. But then the Jazz need to do something with Millsap because this 4-bigs thing will not continue to work and losing players for nothing is not good or smart.
    So either he didn't read my post, was agreeing with it in a very bizarre way, or is saying having Gortat under any circumstance at all creates a logjam.
    Quote Originally Posted by Eenie-Meenie View Post
    I've never stalked anyone in my life, including any of my girl friends.

  7. #37
    Senior Member MattMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    334
    Total Rep Points
    180
    Rep Adjustment Power
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Hedda Gambler View Post
    Kanter/Favors/Gortat would be a very nice trio for next season.
    This.

    I would not having a problem dealing for Gortat if it only meant a combination of Millsap, Al and Raja.

    Hayward isn't going anywhere.

  8. #38
    Wide Awake Stifle Tower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On the Snyde
    Posts
    15,446
    Total Rep Points
    28187
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by pickledXgrandma View Post
    Hayward for Jermaine Oneal. We get a solid veteran that can't really contribute to winning or a winning attitude but its another big we can keep in front of our inexperience worthless young uns.
    So pickledX is really Ty Corbin. Welcome to the board Ty. How much money would it take for you to retire from coaching?

  9. #39
    Admininstrator colton's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    6,451
    Total Rep Points
    12213
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    So either he didn't read my post, was agreeing with it in a very bizarre way, or is saying having Gortat under any circumstance at all creates a logjam.
    I'm going with choice A, meaning he didn't *fully* read your post.
    "Giving to the poor is an essential part of Christian morality. I do not believe one can settle how much we ought to give. I’m afraid the only safe rule is to give more than we can spare... If our charities do not at all pinch or hamper us, I should say they are too small. There ought to be things that we’d like to do but cannot do because our charitable expenditure excludes them." --C.S. Lewis
    :-)

  10. #40
    One Love - One Heart ONE LOVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    20,458
    Total Rep Points
    24662
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    I wouldn't trade Hayward for the world.
    2014CurrentDraftChampion

    2014AllTimeDraftRunner-Up

  11. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,390
    Total Rep Points
    1889
    Rep Adjustment Power
    21
    Quote Originally Posted by Hotttnickkk View Post
    I wouldn't trade Hayward for the world.
    I would, primarily because if I own the world presumably I would still have Hayward.

  12.  

     

  13. #42
    One Love - One Heart ONE LOVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    20,458
    Total Rep Points
    24662
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by mhindy View Post
    I would, primarily because if I own the world presumably I would still have Hayward.
    The "world" in this case would exclude Hayward... otherwise there would be no point trading for him in the first place.

    You dig?
    2014CurrentDraftChampion

    2014AllTimeDraftRunner-Up

  14. #43
    Wide Awake Stifle Tower's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On the Snyde
    Posts
    15,446
    Total Rep Points
    28187
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Gortat, Favors, Kanter would be solid, but not if Hayward is included. Look how the Jazz have struggled in Hayward's absence. Gordon may play out of control at times, but he's still a heckuva player. Unless a franchise player is part of a deal, Hayward, Favors and Kanter are untouchable. Burks is a notch below, but I'd want a top-10 PG for any trade package that includes Alec.

  15. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,426
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    How good is Gortat's defense? Can someone intelligently comment on it in some detail? If it's slightly above average, I wouldn't mind going with Favors/Gortat with Kanter off the bench next year, with a 4th big like Withey or whoever getting just a little time. Gortat's salary is fairly cheap too. The problem is, I feel like the Suns are in the 115 range quite often which leads me to believe MG's d is subpar.

  16. #45
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,426
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Also, like Numb said, if we could get one of their 1sts, wow. I'm 99.9% certain it wouldn't be their own though. But maybe, just maybe we could pry their 1st from the Lakers. Or better yet, I'd rather have their 2014 1st rounder which could very well end up being a top 3 pick in a loaded draft.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •