Repped. Me too. I think Hayward is the ONLY player on the team that seems to give a hoot night in and night out. He never takes a night off unlike everybody else on the team.Originally Posted by JGolds
Repped. Me too. I think Hayward is the ONLY player on the team that seems to give a hoot night in and night out. He never takes a night off unlike everybody else on the team.
Jazz trade Al Jefferson and Jamaal Tinsley/Earl Watson to the Suns for Goran Dragic, Jared Dudley, and the #13 pick? Salary wise it works and the Jazz finally get a point guard, plus they would have #13, #18, and #22 in the 2013 draft.
I'd rather have Mo for only 4-5m a year!!
The Turd makes an excellent point.
It started with Earl [Watson], Randy [Foye] and Marvin [Williams]–the veteran guys. I thought the young guys did a good job of following their lead getting us off to a good start. - referring to the Jazz/Bobcats game on 3/1/13
Earl, Randy, and Marvin started the first quarter 0-3, scored a whopping zero points, and finished with a turnover in the first quarter.
Your head coach of the Jazz ladies and gentlemen.
Why on ****ing earth is Phoenix gutting their team of what little worth is left for our expiring fool's gold?
Playing well is priority #1 and nothing outside of that is really even close. If you're hoping someone else ****s up, then you don't deserve the break.
Mo will make AT LEAST the MLE. I'm just about positive on that. And Mo isn't and never has been much of POINT guard anyway.
Playing well is priority #1 and nothing outside of that is really even close. If you're hoping someone else ****s up, then you don't deserve the break.
you overrate hayward too much he's potential is mike miller prime.
if jazz won't draft Shabazz Muhammad, Dennis Lindsey deserve to be a onun bunun çocuğu
Mo wants to start.. There aren't many teams that would give him that option.... The as constituted now the Jazz can.. Plus Mo fits the style of play of Kanter and favors then of Al and Paul..
Baring a trade for a great pg I'd rather have Mo for cheap then some of the other options out there!!
You'd rather have a simply inferior and older player because they MIGHT play for cheaper? Because that's what you're saying.
This is rather pointless as the Jazz are not in a position to get Dragic without paying a price (in talent) that they shouldn't.
Playing well is priority #1 and nothing outside of that is really even close. If you're hoping someone else ****s up, then you don't deserve the break.
Unless we can get a stud PG I would rather save money for our young four, incase any of them become a stud at their position.... Mo isn't all that bad, he likes it here, can hit the three ball and is a leader.. Is he the perfect solution?? No.. But put a young pg behind him and go from there!!
We're at least two years (after this year) away from that and as it stands the Jazz must find money to spend anyway.
Playing well is priority #1 and nothing outside of that is really even close. If you're hoping someone else ****s up, then you don't deserve the break.
K... That leaves Dragic out of the picture....
Give me some better options!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote