Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 20 of 20
  1. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,041
    Rep Power
    0
    Rep Level
    2147
    I would also like to add a holy poop to that.

  2. #17
    Senior Member franklin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Drinkin haterade, ridin the hate train through hateville
    Posts
    12,707
    Rep Power
    115
    Rep Level
    29482
    We are against CBCP's (Catholic Bishop Conference of the Philippines) theocratic dictatorship. We ask for
    Justice for pedophile victims and CBCP crimes. Equality for woman, homosexuals and non-catholics. Secularism for all world governments.
    Not really the best source to be quoting McFly, but the Catholic reign in the Philippines is something to bitch about. I have a friend who can't get his wife into the US because her ex-husband left her for multiple other wives but the Catholic dominated rules wouldn't allow her a divorce and subsequent legitimate marriage to my friend. Messed up rules in both countries...
    No Mediocrity

  3. #18
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    9,571
    Rep Power
    0
    Rep Level
    0
    I was going to make a smart-ass comment but I'll just reiterate that I'm pretty cynical in regard to extraordinarily powerful religious leaders and things they are in a unique position to know are not true.

  4.  

     

  5. #19
    Senior Member Marty McFly's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    1,492
    Rep Power
    17
    Rep Level
    367
    Quote Originally Posted by franklin View Post
    Not really the best source to be quoting McFly, but the Catholic reign in the Philippines is something to bitch about. I have a friend who can't get his wife into the US because her ex-husband left her for multiple other wives but the Catholic dominated rules wouldn't allow her a divorce and subsequent legitimate marriage to my friend. Messed up rules in both countries...
    Yeah it's not a great source. Interesting speculation nonetheless.

  6. #20
    Senior Member Duck Rodgers's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Provo
    Posts
    4,989
    Rep Power
    35
    Rep Level
    5882
    If I'm reading it correctly, they are not saying the pope was abusing children himself, correct? Because their choice of wording seems to be saying exactly that, but I don't think that's what they meant. Their assertion is that somebody in a European government is now interested in taking a deeper look at the coverup that is already well known, right?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •