From the little I read I think One Brow's point would be better served if he used the term tribalism instead of racialism that is so close to racism that is pretty much impossible to separate between the two. Not the idea behind the word but the words themselves. They're so similar it will cause a visceral reaction from ppl.
With this I'm not saying I agree with One Brow's views or those from others in this thread cause I only read about 2 pages (maybe).
Yes, that explains Serge Ibaka's freakish athleticism. The breeding of his ancestors. In the Republic of Congo. In Africa. DOH!
So if your statement is true, it would be easy to test and prove that African Americans are physically genetically superior to Africans. That proof should be fairly easy to find, so I'll be waiting for your post of the scientific study.......
Is that how it is defined on planet kennykyle? Well, here on Earth that is not the definition, dictionary.com:
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.
That's how it is used by people who stody the phenomenon. Dictionaries are great for looking at popular conceptions, less so if you want to discuss concepts in detail. Also, there is nothing in your definition to indicate it is an individual belief, as opposed to a cultural belief (that is, part of the milleu of beliefs associated with the members of a given culture).
Naturally, cultural associations are an extension of individual associations. Naturally, you can't separate them. That does not prevent you from distinguishing them.
I expect nothing more than denial from you, though. Feel free to refuse to distinguish the two concepts. Feel free to misunderstand me when I discuss them. Feel free to think you are making some sort of contribution to the dialogue when you post based on those assumptions. You only need ot convince yourself, after all.