Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    Senior Member The Thriller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On the Booz Cruise
    Posts
    9,443
    Rep Power
    45
    Rep Level
    8694
    No. Just no.
    Lakers Suck.

  2. #32
    In pursuit of #9 PKM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    45,671
    Rep Power
    150
    Rep Level
    44864
    Quote Originally Posted by Verlin View Post
    Nerd.
    Burn.
    E.J. Wells vs. NAOS

    The confusion...

    ---
    Pre-season mock (7/13/13) - page 111

  3. #33
    Premium Member Vermin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Set twerking dizzy.
    Posts
    5,226
    Rep Power
    54
    Rep Level
    11160
    Quote Originally Posted by PKM View Post
    Burn.
    To the third homey!

  4. #34
    Premium Member Core4's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Dante's inferno
    Posts
    14,299
    Rep Power
    99
    Rep Level
    24348
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkwing Duck View Post
    And in your trade scenario, the Jazz are getting??? Role players and an expiring? All at the expense of another prospect and draft pick? Or, in other terms, the Jazz give up interior scoring for outside shooting. A wash. Anderson and Millsap are redundant, and can't play together, thus their perceived combined strength is negated.

    Jefferson has more value than when the Jazz traded for him (essentially two first round picks). Shorter contract, no injury issue as opposed to long contract, ACL injury.
    It would be better just to let Jefferson's contract expire next season (there's the cap relief) and retain our young players and the GSW pick, which should turn into a starting SF. That's better value than Brooks, Humphries, etc.

  5. #35
    Senior Member Darkwing Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,244
    Rep Power
    31
    Rep Level
    4497
    Quote Originally Posted by svenguru View Post
    Why are you so caught up in playing Anderson and Millsap together?? Anderson would not be the starter. Favors would be the starter along with Millsap. You could bring Anderson off the bench to play alongside Favors or Kanter or millsap. They are better defensively because the two best defensive bigs we have play MORE(ie Favors and Kanter) We could play Millsap and Anderson at time when opposing teams go small and Anderson guards the opposing teams "center" with Millsap guarding the four spot. This would be an occasional combination but not the starting front court.
    The problem, then, is that you're trading Jefferson for backups and trading prospect for prospect, while also trading a likely lotto pick. That's neither good for the present, nor good for the future.


    Quote Originally Posted by negative reputation giver
    youre inquires are tiresome

  6.  

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •