Let's see their stats per 36:Originally Posted by franklin
PPG: Bell 10.05, Burks 16.9
Rebounds: Bell 2.25, Burks 4.78
Assists: Bell 1.65, Burks 1.97
Steals: Bell 0.6, Burks 1.125
PER: Bell 9.03, Burks 14.21
It is not even close. It is cute and all that you're trying to establish your individuality by going against the grain, but at least choose a less laughable position to defend.
Your comps are beyond preposterous (Contrary to reason or common sense; utterly absurd or ridiculous).
Explain why, it is not at all obvious why they are preposterous. They look pretty good to me.
Minus 12
Oh, I'm sorry, I'm not counting made-up-to-win-arguments stats. But if we're counting efficiency stats then:
http://www.82games.com/1112/1112UTA.HTM
Yep, Burks wins in every category.
No context.... just terrible. What happened to reason and scholorship in this country?
Shipped overseas along with jobs.
Bell sucks and Franklin is an idiot for defending him. About the only thing Raja can do these days is defend himself.
Right right. No amount of stats, common sense, or simple logic can beat your "negatory" ownage.
+ 10
- 7
+ 1
- 5
+ 6
- 8
+ 0
- 100
you suck
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote