Rudy 8 boards Curry 7 boards
Rebounding wasnt really an issue. Jazz had an 88% defensive rebound rate.
Rudy 8 boards Curry 7 boards
a team with 3+ hall of famers in or near their prime = a super team. what else would you call that?
at least half that list the players were well past their primes or they're just really good NBA players not fully fledged hall of famers
.... cant tell if you're being serious....
27 of the 30 players I mentioned are or will soon be in the hall of fame. All but the rockets team (who still made it to the conf finals) won 1 or more championships, or attended the finals.
i think you're talking out your ***.
How many of them won 73 games then added another top 3 player in his prime? How many would be close to that?
How many of them won 73 games then added another top 3 player in his prime? How many would be close to that?
.... cant tell if you're being serious....
27 of the 30 players I mentioned are or will soon be in the hall of fame. All but the rockets team (who still made it to the conf finals) won 1 or more championships, or attended the finals.
i think you're talking out your ***.
• kobe shaq malone payton -4 hall of famers, 2 in prime, 2 dwindling - finals
• magic, kareem, james worthy - 3 hall of famers, multiple chips
• elgin baylor, jerry west, wilt the stilt - 3 hall of famers, champs
• bird, mchale, parish, ainge - 3 hall of famers, multiple chips
• bill russell, sam jones, john havlicek - 3 hall of famers, multiple chips
• garnett, pierce, allen - 3 hall of famers, championship
• barkley, hakeem, drexler - 3 hall of famers, WCF
• jordan, pippen, rodman - 3 hall of famers, multiple chips
• thomas, mahorn, dumars, laimbeer - 2 hall of famers, and 2 great players - champs
i think i disagree with the definition of superteam. I'd more think of that as 3 franchise players or very close to it in their primes, or two current mvp types and some all nba types.
going thru your list .. malone dwindling, payton irrelevant
kareem was well past his prime and worthy was a terrific player but not necessarily a franchise player but i'll give them the benefit of the doubt.
baylor etc yes absolutely
parrish i wouldn't class as a franchise type player, and ainge ?? nah
celtics with garnett etc yep
rockets, drexler was on his last legs by then Nope
bulls yeah even tho rodman was not a franchise player
pistons ? lol mahorn, lambeer could hardly be called a great player and dumars not a franchise type not even close to a super team.
so probably 2-3 of those teams i'd class as super teams in the same class as the warriors/cavs/heat kinds of teams everyone's fretting about.
i love having to explain the context of an articulate point, because some people cant read the conversation like 5 posts above the one they are commenting on.
What kills me about Lyles.
He scored two times close to each other, then is lazy getting back, and gives up an and one.
It was nice to see him put the ball in the bucket though.
Im not even worried about Lyles. Kid has a long way to go.
That is a huge concern.
It was my girlfriends birthday so I missed the game. I just watched the game on dvr.
I watched using the fast forward a bunch.
Watching the warriors makes you really hate superstar teams. They are unbeatable when all the stars just join one team. I wonder how many fans will start to give up watching when it's not worth watching anymore. I've already had a handful of friends who don't watch pro basketball cause of things like that.
Sent from my SM-G920V using Tapatalk