What's new

The elephant in the room

Game6Conley

Well-Known Member
etc_elephantroom50__01__630x420.jpg


Warriors blew the Jazz out whilst shooting 24.1% from 3..
 
etc_elephantroom50__01__630x420.jpg


Warriors blew the Jazz out whilst shooting 24.1% from 3..

82 shots for both of us, they made two more than we did.

They shot 9 more FT's than we did. And at a higher percentage.

We had twice as many TO's.

And they had 7 more assists than we did.

It feels like we didn't play our ball offensively very well at all.



Review foul's... see what was good, and what was bad. Calm ourselves down a bit. Play us ball.
 
82 shots for both of us, they made two more than we did.

They shot 9 more FT's than we did. And at a higher percentage.

We had twice as many TO's.

And they had 7 more assists than we did.

It feels like we didn't play our ball offensively very well at all.



Review foul's... see what was good, and what was bad. Calm ourselves down a bit. Play us ball.

It's just one game.
 
Warriors blew the Jazz out whilst shooting 24.1% from 3..

So we defended the three point line pretty well. Now we just need to shut down their runs and find a rhythm on offense and we got this. Thanks for the words of encouragement!
 
12 points isn't a blowout. Plus Hayward and Hill shot 7-24 combined and Jazz had almost double the turnovers. There will be adjustments. Also, we won the rebounding battle and I expect that to continue. Our shots will fall.
 
There is always a glass-half full or empty approach.

Half-full is that they only beat us because they dominated transition buckets, even above their usual level. Limit transition attempts and the Jazz have proven they can slow them down in their half-court sets. Jazz also need to do a better job themselves of creating turnovers and defense into offense transition opportunities to prevent the Warriors from setting their half-court defense every possession. This isnt the Clippers where we can execute into the late clock for mismatches. Has to be more of a focus on ball movement and taking our open looks. Cant rely on isolation against the Warriors.
 
It's just one game.

That's kinda what I was going with, just trying not to invoke the meme.

One game all of these things contributed to our loss. Don't get hindered over it.. just watch the tapes, take your xanax, adjust a bit, and we'll be closer next time.
 
Warriors can and will shoot better from three. But they shot lower percent this game because of defense. We did a good job of getting hands in their faces and running them off the line. Jazz also missed a lot of threes but the Jazz missed open shots. Warriors can hit contested threes but obviously it is less consistent. Hayward isn't going to miss that many wide open shots most games.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I took a look at the thread title and the poster and (naively) expected this thread to be about something much different but more obvious.
 
I saw this game a lot like game 6 in the last series. The Jazz were nervous, tight, and unprepared for the intensity. Let's face it, Golden State is really the superior team. We looked like we were running in mud, they looked like they were all Carl Lewis. The speed of their game took us by surprise. We will have a tough time winning one in this series.

But I also see it as a wake-up call, like game 6 was in the last series. And if there is one thing this team has shown it is an ability to bounce back. I expect game 2 to be a lot closer, even if it is a loss. Quinn has shown he can make effective between-game adjustments. The team will loosen up a bit, make more shots. The D will adjust to the Warriors speed. But above all, like we showed briefly in the 3rd quarter, if we play aggressively we have a shot. If we play like we are already beaten, well we wouldn't have a shot against anyone.
 
Now AB is just in full blown desperation mode for attention. Just ignore the troll.

Narrative bias and a poor choice of words. It's glorious how y'all NEED delusion to justify your arguments with me. There's no proof of what you just said, it's just your opinion, a theory. That all, not even a well formed one. Child please.

I'm here to discuss basketball not looking for attention. The levels of denial in this thread are hysterical. Not because the stat I've cited is deniable, but because of the source. Which is called prejudice.

Because it comes from me, it must be "fake news" amiright? Thats called DENIAL.Ha
 
I took a look at the thread title and the poster and (naively) expected this thread to be about something much different but more obvious.
What'd you have in mind? There's oh so many elephants in the room. The Mob mentality has it's focus elsewhere though.
 
Warriors can and will shoot better from three. But they shot lower percent this game because of defense. We did a good job of getting hands in their faces and running them off the line. Jazz also missed a lot of threes but the Jazz missed open shots. Warriors can hit contested threes but obviously it is less consistent. Hayward isn't going to miss that many wide open shots most games.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using JazzFanz mobile app

TY for an actual on-topic response. Props.
 
So we defended the three point line pretty well. Now we just need to shut down their runs and find a rhythm on offense and we got this. Thanks for the words of encouragement!

ah so your interpretation of this stat is that it's a sign of things to come? the start of a trend? Interesting.. Time will tell.. Lets see.
 
82 shots for both of us, they made two more than we did.

They shot 9 more FT's than we did. And at a higher percentage.

We had twice as many TO's.

And they had 7 more assists than we did.

It feels like we didn't play our ball offensively very well at all.



Review foul's... see what was good, and what was bad. Calm ourselves down a bit. Play us ball.

It's that simple? Enlightening stuff, lets see if that rings true.
 
Top