Not really. Utah is 21st in 3pt% this season at 34.6%, and while you can run some 3 shooter lineups like the Jazz were doing by just replacing Exum with Simmons, I don't really think the Jazz are capable of putting out a Simmons + 4 shooter lineup like the Bucks can with Giannis or LeBron had with the Heat and to a lesser extent the Cavs in his 2nd stint, and the Jazz also aren't able to consistently roll out that lineup while Favors is on the team as well. The slower pace of play would also hurt Simmons to a degree as he is at his absolute best in transition and he might be a top 3 player in transition behind Giannis and LeBron.
Theoretically the best kind of team around Ben Simmons in my view is a team where he plays a small ball 5 or has a C that can defend and also shoot the three (rare), and three wing shooters. I think Philly can actually do a better job of that right now than what the Jazz could as they're 15th in the league in 3pt% and have a C that's willing to take 3s and is also an elite defender, the difference/problem is that two of the guys that would be on the floor also think they should have the ball instead of just spacing the floor in Embiid and Butler. The Jazz can't offer Simmons that without other significant roster moves and a change to the style and pace they play which would drastically differ from what Snyder led teams have historically been. Not saying Snyder isn't capable of that as this year is the first year where he's been close to league average in pace compared to 30th in the Hayward years, but I don't think having to overhaul all of these things to accomodate for Simmons is worth the opportunity cost of giving up Mitchell for.
) 
