The Thriller
Well-Known Member
You really said that 2003-2004 was one of the most fun seasons to watch in Jazz history since Stockton and Malone? A season which we finished as a 9th seed, not making the playoffs for the first time since 1984 ending a 20 year streak of making the playoffs. And you have been in awe for the last 15 years over that season and a point guard who in the best season of his career gave us 12 pts per game and 5 ast? He also averaged 28 minutes per game to achieve those weak stats, and shot 32% from deep, making .5 shots out of 1.6 attempts per game from deep. He also averaged 2.2 turnovers per game. He had a 4.4-10 turnover to assist ratio and your stating (and I quote) "I watched that season, one of the most fun season to watch in Jazz history since Stockton and Malone retired." And your calling me the idiot?? Please, stay in your lane Mario Andretti. THAT YEAR WAS THE FIRST TIME THE JAZZ HAD MISSED THE PLAYOFFS SINCE 1984!!! And I'm the idiot!!?? Pull your lip over your head and swallow.
And last but not least, I never started to compare them, you did that! I am simply stepping in with the baby powder and a back hand pimp slap that you have coming your direction, all because I see a trick stepping out of line. Pick your face up off the floor.
You’re wrong.
The jazz missed out on the playoffs, true. That sucked. But they were projected to be not just bad, but historically had. Seeing how they were competitive under Sloan without S2M was extremely entertaining. It kept the franchise financially viable and a maintained the continuity of class and competitivenes that embodies the franchise today. How often have we said, “x player isn’t a jazz player”? That is largely because of the continuity we had after S2M retired and the franchise’s first great era had expired. The jazz still strive for unselfish and smart players in part because there was no major identity crisis in those first few post S2M years. Did it take them a while to collect talent to rejoin the playoff teams? Yes. But I don’t remember ever thinking, “Man this team is full of selfish jackasses. They’re unbearable to watch. Blow this up.” Like fans of other franchises undoubtedly think (Knicks, Kings, Suns, Nets, etc)
That 2003-2004 season was entertaining. Sloan should’ve won COY easily that year. It set the jazz up for a nice run under the Boozer-Okur-Williams era. Honestly, the only time in the past 30 years I think we’ve suffered from an identity crisis where team interest sagged was under the brief Corbin era. The team lacked talent, had no offensive game plan, and wasn’t fun to watch. Watch Al Jefferson hog the ball and then dog it on defense wasn’t fun at all. Thank god we signed Snyder and reestablished our identity.
Had the jazz been as historically nauseating as most experts predicted, I’m not sure if the franchise survives (especially considering the recession and movement of major franchises ala Seattle) until the Gobert-Mitchell Jazz era of 2019.
Last edited: