What's new

You're the GM this offseason. What do you do?

I tend to agree about mgt being conservative. Can't upset the business model.
Is our business model to get blown out of the playoffs every year? Is our business model to lose our talented drafted players to free agency in exchange for nothing? Is our business model to remain a team that has ZERO championships? Oh yea, we better not disrupt that! Thank's for your 2 cents!
 
I would definitely take a chance on Josh Jackson. Maybe TJ Warren too. During the draft, I would trade Korver and #23 for Jackson and #32. It's worth the gamble. I know Igor was the coach last year but that roster and franchise is a mess. I think with better support around Jackson, and a better leader than Booker, maybe he could reach is potential which is still really high.

Financially, this isn't that bad for us:

Korver is $7.5 if kept and $3.44 if waived. #23 has a salary of $1.89. So waived Korver plus #23 is still $5.4 million vs Jackson's 2019-20 salary of $7 million. Picking up Jackson really doesn't sacrifice any big time summer targets.

We could select somebody with #32 or maybe even trade it for a very late 1st rounder in a future draft or for multiple future 2nd rounders or select a player we might have liked at #23 (Carsen Edwards, Admiral Schofield, etc.).

Josh Jackson was arrested on the 13th for something stupid. I don't think we need him.
 
I don’t think the FO has any interest in him. I mean, interest like, hey, we’ll take him for a second rounder, but not interest in the sense of “we think this guy helps us.” They’ve already staked their opinion on him (twice) — that he’s not worth a first round pick. And if you don’t value someone enough to think they’re worth a first round pick, I don’t think you really value them at all, other than, best case scenario, seeing them as a decent accessory.

I like Mirotic, but I would hate to see what we would give up for him. There's no way we could negotiate trading for him and just give up a second round pick, when we couldn't negotiate anything better that giving up 27 year old Burks AND two second round picks for 37 year old Korver. I know yall on this site are sick of me bringing this trade up. But I want everyone to remember the capabilities and our inabilities are at the front office. I'm worried for any of our valuable draft picks that are in trade consideration because our FO doesn't value them.
 
Brogdon is great and would be a great fit on the Jazz but I just don't see the Bucks letting him go. I don't think it's worth it to tie up our cap space for 3 days just to have the Bucks match, meanwhile all the other free agents are signing elsewhere while we wait.

I'm lost. So you don't think the Bucks will give up Brogdon so why should the Jazz even try? But all the other free agents are signing elsewhere during that three days? So lets only offer bottom of the barrel guys contracts? I think all the other free agents are signing elsewhere because teams try and make offers. I would bet that you will definitely fail at signing any player in the league if you never show interest. Wouldn't you?
 
I'm lost. So you don't think the Bucks will give up Brogdon so why should the Jazz even try? But all the other free agents are signing elsewhere during that three days? So lets only offer bottom of the barrel guys contracts? I think all the other free agents are signing elsewhere because teams try and make offers. I would bet that you will definitely fail at signing any player in the league if you never show interest. Wouldn't you?
You're right but Jingled is also right in saying that there's no real point in having the Bucks tie up your cap space for 3 days when it's about 99% confirmed he's staying with the Bucks considered he's an RFA. You can express interest in a number of other ways without necessarily tying up your cap space and putting yourself out of the free agency picture for 72 hours. You want to be aggressive with offers to UFAs not RFAs.
 
I like Mirotic, but I would hate to see what we would give up for him. There's no way we could negotiate trading for him and just give up a second round pick, when we couldn't negotiate anything better that giving up 27 year old Burks AND two second round picks for 37 year old Korver. I know yall on this site are sick of me bringing this trade up. But I want everyone to remember the capabilities and our inabilities are at the front office. I'm worried for any of our valuable draft picks that are in trade consideration because our FO doesn't value them.

Mirotic is a free agent iirc. Dont have to give anything up in a trade.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Is our business model to get blown out of the playoffs every year? Is our business model to lose our talented drafted players to free agency in exchange for nothing? Is our business model to remain a team that has ZERO championships? Oh yea, we better not disrupt that! Thank's for your 2 cents!
The business model they follow good, bad or indifferent is to not pay the luxury tax and to have two rounds of playoff games. The 2nd round is where their profit is. Part of that is why you didn't see them bringing in players that had been bought out. Affects the labor costs to get to black ink. I'm not saying this is a good way to fun a railroad.
 
What is the timeline on when Memphis will be moving Conley?

Doesn't it change everything for us to sign free agents before trading for him, and totally limits us if we trade for him before July 1st?

Is that how it works? NBA salary stuff is so confusing.
 
What is the timeline on when Memphis will be moving Conley?

Doesn't it change everything for us to sign free agents before trading for him, and totally limits us if we trade for him before July 1st?

Is that how it works? NBA salary stuff is so confusing.

Yeah basically. I think you could theoretically agree on a trade with them, but not finalize it until after you’ve signed a free agent. The salary would have to match up though in that case
 
Yeah basically. I think you could theoretically agree on a trade with them, but not finalize it until after you’ve signed a free agent. The salary would have to match up though in that case
So trading for Conley then signing Harris is basically impossible, but signing Harris then trading for Conley works in theory, right?
 
I really hope there is a concrete plan being established, and that the plan develops successfully.

Conley is not the answer if he comes alone. But I would take Conley and Harris over Rubio and Favors. If we can’t get a great PG (Kemba), then I think it’s time to seriously consider making DM our starting PG. I think he’s more than qualified. Then we overpay and go get Harris.

DM/Royce/Ingles/Harris/Gobert
 
I really hope there is a concrete plan being established, and that the plan develops successfully.

Conley is not the answer if he comes alone. But I would take Conley and Harris over Rubio and Favors. If we can’t get a great PG (Kemba), then I think it’s time to seriously consider making DM our starting PG. I think he’s more than qualified. Then we overpay and go get Harris.

DM/Royce/Ingles/Harris/Gobert
I think the plan is that we had planned on this summer being the plan, but the closer we got to it, the more it appeared to be a desert mirage, and the more we fall in love with our guys all over again. If July 7th comes and goes and Favors becomes guaranteed, and if we've yet to lock anyone up, I anticipate the "now he can be used as a $17M expiring trade chip" discussion to heat up and ultimately fan out after the deadline.
 
I's hard to see Kemba turning down the supermax and losing all that money. If the Hornets are willing to pay him that much then I think he stays in Charlotte for sure.

 
Top