What's new

Great Pyramid at Giza

  • Thread starter Deleted member 5000
  • Start date
Am I missing something here? What's so funny about calculating weight from mass?
Let's say I have a pillow whose mass is 2 feet squared. I also have a brick whose mass is 2 feet squared. Do they weigh the same?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
For something in a stationary position, they are fundamentally the same. We use the same terms for weight and mass (pound, kilogram, etc.) interchangeably.

Weight is a force measured by Newton's. Mass is measured by kilograms. The two should never be confused as the same stationary or not.
 
Let's say I have a pillow whose mass is 2 feet squared. I also have a brick whose mass is 2 feet squared. Do they weigh the same?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Size and mass are not the same. Mass and weight are not the same. Mass is a factor of volume and density of an object. Weight is a factor of mass and gravity.
 
Let's say I have a pillow whose mass is 2 feet squared. I also have a brick whose mass is 2 feet squared. Do they weigh the same?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
I do not want to be a smarta** (or i miss sarcasm in your post), but do they really teach physics in US schools that way? I.e that you measure mass/weight with square feet instead of pounds/kilograms? Shouldn't 2 feet squared mean an area size and you actually mean imply that the weight is different between the same size pillow and brick?
 
I do not want to be a smarta** (or i miss sarcasm in your post), but do they really teach physics in US schools that way? I.e that you measure mass/weight with square feet instead of pounds/kilograms? Shouldn't 2 feet squared mean an area size and you actually mean imply that the weight is different between the same size pillow and brick?
No.
I didn't graduate from my high school.
I don't know ****

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Am I missing something here? What's so funny about calculating weight from mass?
How did they determine the mass? He says it like it's some obvious thing "We know the weight because we can calculate it based on the mass" but neither is easier to determine and you'd generally use the same method to determine either one while standing still on planet earth.

I mean maybe he means they know the mass of granite so they are basing the weight on actual volumetric calculations... It was still a stupid thing for him to say IMHO.
 
I do not want to be a smarta** (or i miss sarcasm in your post), but do they really teach physics in US schools that way? I.e that you measure mass/weight with square feet instead of pounds/kilograms? Shouldn't 2 feet squared mean an area size and you actually mean imply that the weight is different between the same size pillow and brick?
Why not? Something that is massive has to do with it's size, amirite?
 
Weight is a force measured by Newton's. Mass is measured by kilograms. The two should never be confused as the same stationary or not.

So, how do you measure mass, in a distinct manner from weight? I'm only aware of methods using acceleration.
 
Size and mass are not the same. Mass and weight are not the same. Mass is a factor of volume and density of an object. Weight is a factor of mass and gravity.

I always though of density as being defined by mass and volume, not the other way around.
 
How did they determine the mass? He says it like it's some obvious thing "We know the weight because we can calculate it based on the mass" but neither is easier to determine and you'd generally use the same method to determine either one while standing still on planet earth.

I mean maybe he means they know the mass of granite so they are basing the weight on actual volumetric calculations... It was still a stupid thing for him to say IMHO.
Nah, dude. Just because you don't know it, doesn't make it stupid.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Pyramid_of_Giza

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/geometry/blocks.html

Graham definitely teaches and promotes pseudoscience, but he's still smarter and more educated on the pyramids than you and anyone you know.
 
Last edited:
Nah, dude. Just because you don't know it, doesn't make it stupid.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/geometry/blocks.html

Graham definitely teaches and promotes pseudoscience, but he's still smarter and more educated on the pyramids than you and anyone you know.
You just posted something saying that because they know the WEIGHT of each block of granite they know how much the WEIGHT of the pyramid is.

To say we know the weight of the pyramid by calculating it based on the mass is still a stupid statement. He should have said we know the weight because we've counted all the granite blocks and know how much each of them weighs.
 
So, how do you measure mass, in a distinct manner from weight? I'm only aware of methods using acceleration.

Density = m/v so the answer would be m = V×D.

That said, you can start looking into it more on a quantum level too and throw in the theory of relativity and curvatures.
 
Top