What's new

List of Jazzmen in the last 30 years to average more points than Bojan

infection

Well-Known Member
Staff member
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
1. Karl Malone.
2. Donovan Mitchell.

Guys not on the list:

1. Gordon Hayward.
2. Carlos Boozer.
3. Deron Williams.
4. Jeff Hornacek.
5. Mehmet Okur.
6. Andrei Kirilenko.
7. Jeff Malone.
8. Al Jefferson.
9. Paul Millsap.
10. John Stockton.
 
Wow so we have 2 of the 3 best scorers the jazz have ever had, but it's damn near a crap shoot every night if we are going to play good enough to have a chance. Ugh.

And the second best defender in Jazz history.

Also, no Matt Harpring on the list?
 
Players score more points on average nowadays than in the past because of the new rules and all.

Mike Conley was supposed to be our other reliable scoring option outside of Mitchell. Still nice to have two scorers on the team though.
 
Yeah, he should be the 3-time defending DPOY right now, headed for his fourth straight.
Lots of hype on Anthony Davis. Votes may be more thoughtless this year.
 
Someone should make a thread called List of Jazzmen in the last 30 years to get paid more than 30 million a year.

It would be a short read, but would read.
 
Players score more points on average nowadays than in the past because of the new rules and all.

Mike Conley was supposed to be our other reliable scoring option outside of Mitchell. Still nice to have two scorers on the team though.
This is recency bias and not at all accurate. Harden is an anomaly in his own right but generally players are not scoring any more than in previous years. Go look at the averages from the 80's where multiple players would score 30+ for the season. We haven't had that in a while.
 
This is recency bias and not at all accurate. Harden is an anomaly in his own right but generally players are not scoring any more than in previous years. Go look at the averages from the 80's where multiple players would score 30+ for the season. We haven't had that in a while.
Data is insufficient to support your analysis. Good analysis would be to compare the number of players per team averaging 20+ in the league per year.
 
Data is insufficient to support your analysis. Good analysis would be to compare the number of players per team averaging 20+ in the league per year.
Anecdotally, in the '80s, ticket holders got free fries(?) if the Jazz held their opponent to less than 100 points.
 
This is recency bias and not at all accurate. Harden is an anomaly in his own right but generally players are not scoring any more than in previous years. Go look at the averages from the 80's where multiple players would score 30+ for the season. We haven't had that in a while.

Data is insufficient to support your analysis. Good analysis would be to compare the number of players per team averaging 20+ in the league per year.

If you look at this season's or last season's points per 48 minutes they are way higher than older years. They are even higher than the 1986-87 season when Michael Jordan had his career high in average ppg. So the statistics do back it up.
https://stats.nba.com/leaders/?Season=2019-20&SeasonType=Regular Season&PerMode=Per48

If you only went by the unadjusted ppg metric, then yes it would appear players are scoring about the same. But top scorers played more minutes per game back then, so you have to account for that.

Also, it's been a very clear trend of the NBA to promote higher scoring to try and boost ratings. That's why the rules changed so that the shot clock resets to 14 instead of the full 24 after hitting the rim, why you can barely touch players without getting a foul called, and why you have seen final box scores creep up over the last few years.
 
Data is insufficient to support your analysis. Good analysis would be to compare the number of players per team averaging 20+ in the league per year.
You do that. Let us know how it goes.
 
Top