Brunson I could understand, but why would Barrett not be thrilled?I wonder how RJ barret feels about all these trade rumors of mitchell? must not be too thrilled.
I understand how the deal would work, I just don’t think it makes sense to the Knicks to swap Rose for Beverley if it’s not necessary - and I don’t think it is. I think Beverley has more value somewhere else and should end up in a different deal.Oh, I'm saying it would be a stipulation of the deal.
For example - Don goes for Fournier, Grimes, McBride and a load of picks. In a separate deal, Beverley goes for Rose.
Not happening imoI want 6 1st rounders + Toppin, Grimes, Fournier and maybe a swap. Flip Fournier
What did you have for dinner last night?Not happening imo
You might be right, and Thibs is a fan of Rose.I understand how the deal would work, I just don’t think it makes sense to the Knicks to swap Rose for Beverley if it’s not necessary - and I don’t think it is. I think Beverley has more value somewhere else and should end up in a different deal.
I think Beverley gets packaged with another player and shipped out as soon as he can aggregate unless someone offers a protected 1st for just him. No reason to think he’ll stay in Utah this year. Just seems like a temporary stop for him imo.You might be right, and Thibs is a fan of Rose.
I just see Beverley being a smart pick up for NY if they are trying to take this young team to the next level. He surely has no place in Utah with what we're doing.
Beverly is a unique asset that teams on the cusp crave. Someone is going to overpay by the trade deadline and we going to be carrying DA on our shoulders through the streets of Provo.You might be right, and Thibs is a fan of Rose.
I just see Beverley being a smart pick up for NY if they are trying to change the culture for this young team. He surely has no place in Utah with what we're doing.
It was like a scalloped potatoes cooked in onions with some hamburger. Really good stuff. Plus my usual carrots, string cheese, and aussie bites.What did you have for dinner last night?
They basically play the same spot. I guess Barrett could just play the 3 as they are as close to interchangeable as positions can be. It depends on who goes and who stays. I'm sure he wants his minutes.Brunson I could understand, but why would Barrett not be thrilled?
I agree with that 100%. Beverley won't play a minute for us. Damn shame too.No reason to think he’ll stay in Utah this year. Just seems like a temporary stop for him imo.
Tonight im having ribs and I cant wait.It was like a scalloped potatoes cooked in onions with some hamburger. Really good stuff. Plus my usual carrots, string cheese, and aussie bites.
I think Barrett will play the 3, and Thibs will stagger Brunson and Don a lot so that Barrett gets minutes at SG too.They basically play the same spot. I guess Barrett could just play the 3 as they are as close to interchangeable as positions can be. It depends on who goes and who stays. I'm sure he wants his minutes.
He's a good player. I think playoff teams will want him so it probably depends on who is willing to pay the most. At this point we are a shopping mall for all seasoned players. Anyone who wants them, Ainge will listen. Bev would be a good option on the Knicks, especially with Thibs. Honestly though, he would be good on any team trying to win.I agree with that 100%. Beverley won't play a minute for us. Damn shame too.