Wade is quicker, stronger, more athletic, more skilled, more handsome, wears nicer clothes, makes more money, ..... the list goes on .... Why are people comparing Burks to Wade?
Originally Posted by Eenie-Meenie
11-19-2012 10:02 AM
I do remember that many of the players were talking about how good Burks was playing and last year Corbin mentioned several times I need to get Alex more minutes. I guess you need to ask the money question when/if he gets a big contract. I know he still makes a lot but not by NBA standard beside the fact that he was never highly recruited so he must have some work ethic to reach the NBA.
Originally Posted by orangello
Burks is really, really good at one thing. That's enough to warrant developing him. It worked for Millsap, Alec can get better too. But Utah is already developing 4 other players, has 2 incoming picks and wants to be a playoff contender immediately, AND has a huge hole at PG.
"I'm a moron for thinking the Browns could even sniff 10 wins in a division where the other three teams (two of whom almost always make the playoffs) made the post-season last year. Gyp Rosetti's thee God of football knowledge." - Brown Notes
Originally Posted by kennykyle
because, metrically, they are similar.
(coming out of college)
B - 6'10''
W - 8'6''
B - 8'7.5''
Max Vertical Jump
W - 35''
B - 36''
W - 6.7%
B - 5.1%
W - 10.56
B - 10.96
W - 3.08
B - 3.17
W - 46%,30%,74%
B - 43%,33%,73%
Rookie #'s per 36
W - 16.8 pts, 4.2 rebs, 4.7 asts, 1.5 stls, 3.3 to's
B - 16.3 pts, 5.1 rebs, 2.1 asts, 1.0 stls, 2 to's
BIGGEST DIFFERENCE (rookies)
Wade - 35 mins/game
Burks - 16 mins/game
One had a coach who decided to invest in him, the other had a coach who didn't.
Sometimes that is the biggest factor in all of this.
Has anyone noticed how bad Burks is on defense? Maybe thats why he dont play. And the fact that he cant hit a free throw. If your one skill is getting to the line, then you better hit your free throws. He doesnt do himself any favors by showing he doesnt like to work on that part of his game.
I like Burks and want to see what he can turn into too but he has to be ready when he is called upon.
And will someone tell him he defends like a jackass. Stop over playing your man. Also he could use a little added weight. Dude isnt very strong, and it shows.
I think to succeed in the Jazz system, the first thing you need to know how to do is be in the right place on the offense. He doesnt do that well either.
I guess Burks could be Wade and Ty is the only thing holding him back.
Wait .. who picked me?
Originally Posted by kennykyle
EDIT: This no longer makes sense because I changed my sig.
Last edited by Dr. Jones; 11-19-2012 at 02:10 PM.
Fortune and glory, kid. Fortune and glory.
This is probably the most fair and balanced post about the burks playing time issue.
Originally Posted by Brown Notes
I personally believe (like most others) that burks should be getting regular minutes in the rotation.... however you make some good points here as to why he isnt
The numbers speak for themselves in jope's post above. Burks and Wade are extremely similar, both numbers wise, and athletically.
Originally Posted by Hack
Now yes, maybe Burks isn't the greatest on the team defensively.... but neither was Wade at that point in his career. Is he as good defensively right now then Demarre Carroll? Absolutely not.
But Foye? I'm guessing yes.
The problem is Foye receiving all of these minutes while stinking it up for three straight games.
Also, we all know Burks needs to add some weight as I'm sure he will.
Kirilenko, Brewer, Hayward, and CJ Miles have all done this successfully.
I thought we could use a laugh with Miles in there.
"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson
"Confucius" say: He who cannot make jump shot.....should practice jump shot when young.....not worry about dunking!
Originally Posted by doubledribble