Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 64
  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    8,383
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    11729
    Rep Adjustment Power
    68
    Doesn't matter how many minutes your young guys get if there is no offensive scheme, no coaching, and no improving...

  2. # ADS
    Circuit advertisement
    Join Date
    Always
    Posts
    Many
     

  3. #32
    Punch Bowl Re-Filler
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Enemy territory (Warrior land)
    Posts
    20,834
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    39897
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    OK, I'll attempt to settle this once and for all...




  4. #33
    In pursuit of #9 Dr. Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    62,121
    Mentioned
    171 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    96720
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm warming to Rondo. As long as the Jazz are dedicated to the 3 (otherwise).
    About FT.
    Fortune and glory, kid. Fortune and glory.

  5. #34
    PROUD SUPPORTER ONE LOVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    38,189
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    43678
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by MoTown16 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    OK, I'll attempt to settle this once and for all...



    I choose neither...
    A New Hope....



  6. #35
    PROUD SUPPORTER ONE LOVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    38,189
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    43678
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by One Brow View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I am not assuming any such thing. I am asking you to explain your assumption that this has been a significant factor for the Warriors this year, when it had not been a facotr in previous years, is not helping the Raptors, etc. I am pointing out that selectiong this years Warriors as your example is cherry-picking.
    I'm only interested in the comparison for the past year because:

    - we had a group of developing young players
    - we were approaching a very deep draft class and you can get a decent player up around the 25th pick
    - we were about to lose Millsap & Jefferson anyway, so there is a pressing need to develop young players quickly to fill that void.
    - in fact, we could have traded Paul&AL at the dateline for a couple of late round picks & move up. And moving up would have been easier due to the amount of talent late in the draft.

    In my opinion all those factors mean that the GSW Strategy (or Toronto or Cleveland, or whatever you want to call it) was more suited to the Jazz than the one we settled on.

    Granted it won't work every year, but if there was a year that we should have used it, it would have been last year.
    A New Hope....



  7. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Metro East, St. Louis
    Posts
    9,590
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    11039
    Rep Adjustment Power
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by Hotttnickkk View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I'm only interested in the comparison for the past year ...In my opinion all those factors mean that the GSW Strategy (or Toronto or Cleveland, or whatever you want to call it) was more suited to the Jazz than the one we settled on.
    Then, bring Toronto and Cleveland into your original analysis. The only reason I can see for you choosing the Warriors, specifically, is because they have been winning recently, and you wanted to use that as justifrication to promote your preferred development strategy.
    http://lifetheuniverseandonebrow.blogspot.com/

    Isaiah 1:18 -- Come now, and let us reason together

    Any habitual action, such as eating or dressing, may be performed on the appropriate occasion, without any need of thought, and the same seems to be true of a painfully large proportion of our talk. -- Bertrand Russell

  8. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    2,794
    Mentioned
    53 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    5136
    Rep Adjustment Power
    45

    also....

    Quote Originally Posted by One Brow View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Confirmation bias. The strategy you outline was a recipe for the Warriors playing badly for many years. Taking one year where they seem to have things together in the first third is selective perception.

    Spot on. Also "immediacy bias" -- reacting emotionally to the most recent data and ignoring the longer-term fundamentals/ trends.

  9. #38
    PROUD SUPPORTER ONE LOVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    38,189
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    43678
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by One Brow View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Then, bring Toronto and Cleveland into your original analysis. The only reason I can see for you choosing the Warriors, specifically, is because they have been winning recently, and you wanted to use that as justifrication to promote your preferred development strategy.
    Do you know why I didn't bring Toronto or Cleveland into the mix?

    Because GSW actually had a decent team that could have contended at least for the 8th seed (which is similar to the Jazz). But for some reason, Curry & Lee conveniently got "injured" and were out for the remainder of the season.

    It was GSW's strategy to "suck" for the remainder of the season - and their intention was pretty obvious given that they'll get our pick if they "suck" badly enough. So there is an incentive there. Now I can't say for certain that that's what Toronto or Cleveland did. Why? Because Toronto finished above GSW even though they actually had a worse roster to begin the year with. Cleveland also didn't have nearly as good a roster as GSW to begin the year with. If you want to expand the pool you can include the Hornets which finished the year strong, but lucked out in getting Davis. Bobcats were just bad to begin with too so they didn't even have to "tank".

    See most of these teams didn't even have to try to "tank" - they're just bad naturally. That's not the strategy/model I'm talking about. What I'm talking about is a decent team playing bad. With GSW, near the end of the season, Jackson would pull Thompson & Jenkins out of the 4th quarter just because they were playing too well. He was questioned about this by local and National Media at the time - all he could say was, he needs to give other guys "experience".

    GSW's strategy was so deliberate, it clearly changed as the season went on. I can't say the same for Toronto, Cleveland, Hornets, Bobcats, etc.
    A New Hope....



  10. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Metro East, St. Louis
    Posts
    9,590
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    11039
    Rep Adjustment Power
    65
    Quote Originally Posted by Hotttnickkk View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Do you know why I didn't bring Toronto or Cleveland into the mix? ...Curry & Lee conveniently got "injured" and were out for the remainder of the season....GSW's strategy was so deliberate, it clearly changed as the season went on. I can't say the same for Toronto, Cleveland, Hornets, Bobcats, etc.
    So, playing young players more minutes only improves them if you are deliberately tanking, but not if you need to play them because you don't have any better players?
    http://lifetheuniverseandonebrow.blogspot.com/

    Isaiah 1:18 -- Come now, and let us reason together

    Any habitual action, such as eating or dressing, may be performed on the appropriate occasion, without any need of thought, and the same seems to be true of a painfully large proportion of our talk. -- Bertrand Russell

  11. #40
    PROUD SUPPORTER ONE LOVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    38,189
    Mentioned
    215 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    43678
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by One Brow View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So, playing young players more minutes only improves them if you are deliberately tanking, but not if you need to play them because you don't have any better players?
    I guess what I'm saying is the GSW model can be summed up in 1 word: Flexibility.

    - They had a decent roster
    - They owe us a top 8 pick
    - It was a loaded draft class
    - They had some young players

    So they assessed the situation and were flexible enough to make the most of their situation.

    - They got our pick.
    - They picked Barnes (who would have been the No. 2 pick in 2011)
    - They got Thompson & Jenkins some experience.

    All those things had nothing to do with how many W's they get this year. They are assets they can use going forward. They made the most of the cards that were dealt to them.

    We didn't.
    A New Hope....



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are a community of Utah JazzFanz that are passionate about our team. We celebrate the highs that come with last second heroics and (some of us) cry in defeat. Welcome to our community. Be respectful of others and join in to the conversation...
Join us