Thanks for reminding me about that.
Originally Posted by Stoked
Cy is a Baker, he doesn't work fast food. Don't make that mistake, he doesn't like it.
02-11-2013 10:37 AM
Gortat, or any other big, is the LAST thing we need. We don't need to keep the logjam going/excuse to not play favors and kanter.
Originally Posted by NUMBERICA
Would love to get Dragic.
Having 3-bigs that can play is not a logjam. Are you serious?
Originally Posted by zman1527
"Adversity is opportunity in disguise."
We're not trading Hayward, but I'd think about these trades:
Dudley has a nice contract, fills a need at SF and can shoot 3's consistently. I really like Dragic. Let Millsap walk next year and we still have a rotation of Favors/Gortat/Kanter which is awesome.
Maybe get the suns to give up a first rounder either this year or the next or swap with ours
Yeah we aren't moving Hayward but even if he was available, not sure I would do those. It looks to me like basically we would be choosing between Dragic or Hayward. I like Hayward more in the present and future. I think we are starting to see the best of Dragic now (as a 14 point, 6-7 assist) guy and I would rather have Hayward than that, even with our hole at that position.
Originally Posted by bovice
Would you trade hayward for their unprotected pick? I think I may. Especially if Jazz brass decides that Burks is the guy at the 2. Hayward is not a three so we really have a log jam with two of our young four. If we could parlay Jefferson and Hayward into that unprotected pick Id do it and hope Bazz' is there when we go.
Bazz is the only pick I'd be excited about enough to move Hayward, but that's too much of a risk for my liking.
Originally Posted by Vermin
hate is. hayward is probably my favorite player on utah right now.. i dont think the ungarenteed turnaround of a draft pick would be worth hayward.
“Silence is golden, and gold is up these days, so silence is a solid investment.”
― Jarod Kintz
It is Hayward and Kanter for me. Then Favors, Burks and Carrroll.
Originally Posted by JGolds
Who would the Jazz waive in this scenario? Tinsley or Watson? Murphy?
Originally Posted by Chris
That was easy for me.
Originally Posted by nightmare3983
I just don't see us giving up Hayward unless it was for a good lotto pick plus a nice player.
Dudley and Gorat are decent, but nothing special. Nothing to trade Hay, and our leading scorer for.
"les grandes défaites forgent les grands hommes" - Rudy Gobert
I think the Suns have asked about Gordon Hayward, I don't think the Jazz would deal him unless it's for a top 20 player in the league. Unless their lottery pick is in the mix, I think Gordon is off the table. I could see the Suns sending Gortat & Dudley to Utah for Jefferson and one of our picks. I think that's pretty fair for both sides. I really hope the Jazz don't pull off a trade like that. I would love to have Gortat on the Jazz, but not at the expense of Favors & Kanter. Gortat would just perpetuate the problem that we are dealing with now.
- Total Rep Points
- Rep Adjustment Power
I would do Al and Hayward for Gortat, Dudley, Marshall and their UNPROTECTED pick. We would have 3 picks and including a top 10. If we could turn those into a star we would be set...
Unless we moved Say Milsap and both our picks for Bledsoe. Turning Jefferson, Milsap and 2 middling picks for Gortat (thrid Big), Dudley ( 3 point shooter with better all around game than Foye) and our PG of the future being Bledsoe would turn this team around in a hurry. Reality is we trade two first round picks forthis package as I dont believe either player are in our future plans.