Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 87
  1. #31
    Senior Member pickledXgrandma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    the sugar hole
    Posts
    1,000
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    3112
    Rep Adjustment Power
    33
    Hayward for Jermaine Oneal. We get a solid veteran that can't really contribute to winning or a winning attitude but its another big we can keep in front of our inexperience worthless young uns.

  2. #32
    Junior Member Grimmetal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    15
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    110
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    https://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=aftz4kr

    Thats what I would do. Milsap and Jefferson for Dudley, Gortat and Dragic.
    Another version would be Jefferson for Dudley and Dragic straight up, which I actually like better since that clears room for Kanter and Favors if you don't add a big back in (Gortat).

  3. #33
    Senior Member pkmag2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA
    Posts
    308
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    79
    Rep Adjustment Power
    26
    Boo. Hayward stAys!

  4. #34
    All Around Nice Guy colton's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    9,469
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    19675
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Quote Originally Posted by zman1527 View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Gortat, or any other big, is the LAST thing we need. We don't need to keep the logjam going/excuse to not play favors and kanter.

    Would love to get Dragic.
    Having 3-bigs that can play is not a logjam. Are you serious?
    Unless the Jazz also trade Millsap, there would still be four bigs. I think that's what zman was talking about.
    "Wherefore, do not spend money for that which is of no worth, nor your labor for that which cannot satisfy." --2 Nephi 9:51

    :-)

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Bergen, Norway
    Posts
    410
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    1525
    Rep Adjustment Power
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by colton View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Unless the Jazz also trade Millsap, there would still be four bigs. I think that's what zman was talking about.
    Yeah, but for how long? Getting Gortat would pretty much spell the definite end for Millsap in Utah. Kanter/Favors/Gortat would be a very nice trio for next season.

  6. #36
    Senior Member NUMBERICA's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    15,089
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    20499
    Rep Adjustment Power
    97
    Quote Originally Posted by colton View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Unless the Jazz also trade Millsap, there would still be four bigs. I think that's what zman was talking about.
    No, that's actually what I was talking about in the very post he quoted:

    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Al for Gortat is something I'd be very into. But then the Jazz need to do something with Millsap because this 4-bigs thing will not continue to work and losing players for nothing is not good or smart.
    So either he didn't read my post, was agreeing with it in a very bizarre way, or is saying having Gortat under any circumstance at all creates a logjam.
    Mark Cuban is a ****ing sociopath.

  7. #37
    Senior Member MattMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    334
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    180
    Rep Adjustment Power
    22
    Quote Originally Posted by Hedda Gambler View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Kanter/Favors/Gortat would be a very nice trio for next season.
    This.

    I would not having a problem dealing for Gortat if it only meant a combination of Millsap, Al and Raja.

    Hayward isn't going anywhere.

  8. #38
    Punch Bowl Re-Filler
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Enemy territory (Warrior land)
    Posts
    20,834
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    39897
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by pickledXgrandma View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Hayward for Jermaine Oneal. We get a solid veteran that can't really contribute to winning or a winning attitude but its another big we can keep in front of our inexperience worthless young uns.
    So pickledX is really Ty Corbin. Welcome to the board Ty. How much money would it take for you to retire from coaching?

  9. #39
    All Around Nice Guy colton's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    9,469
    Mentioned
    55 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    19675
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by NUMBERICA View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    So either he didn't read my post, was agreeing with it in a very bizarre way, or is saying having Gortat under any circumstance at all creates a logjam.
    I'm going with choice A, meaning he didn't *fully* read your post.
    "Wherefore, do not spend money for that which is of no worth, nor your labor for that which cannot satisfy." --2 Nephi 9:51

    :-)


  10. #40
    Keeping it REAL ONE LOVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    36,885
    Mentioned
    132 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    42693
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    I wouldn't trade Hayward for the world.

  11. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Posts
    1,734
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    2933
    Rep Adjustment Power
    34
    Quote Originally Posted by Hotttnickkk View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I wouldn't trade Hayward for the world.
    I would, primarily because if I own the world presumably I would still have Hayward.

  12. #42
    Keeping it REAL ONE LOVE's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    36,885
    Mentioned
    132 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    42693
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by mhindy View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I would, primarily because if I own the world presumably I would still have Hayward.
    The "world" in this case would exclude Hayward... otherwise there would be no point trading for him in the first place.

    You dig?

  13. #43
    Punch Bowl Re-Filler
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Enemy territory (Warrior land)
    Posts
    20,834
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    39897
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Gortat, Favors, Kanter would be solid, but not if Hayward is included. Look how the Jazz have struggled in Hayward's absence. Gordon may play out of control at times, but he's still a heckuva player. Unless a franchise player is part of a deal, Hayward, Favors and Kanter are untouchable. Burks is a notch below, but I'd want a top-10 PG for any trade package that includes Alec.

  14. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,425
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    How good is Gortat's defense? Can someone intelligently comment on it in some detail? If it's slightly above average, I wouldn't mind going with Favors/Gortat with Kanter off the bench next year, with a 4th big like Withey or whoever getting just a little time. Gortat's salary is fairly cheap too. The problem is, I feel like the Suns are in the 115 range quite often which leads me to believe MG's d is subpar.

  15. #45
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Tabor Heights
    Posts
    12,425
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    4891
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Also, like Numb said, if we could get one of their 1sts, wow. I'm 99.9% certain it wouldn't be their own though. But maybe, just maybe we could pry their 1st from the Lakers. Or better yet, I'd rather have their 2014 1st rounder which could very well end up being a top 3 pick in a loaded draft.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are a community of Utah JazzFanz that are passionate about our team. We celebrate the highs that come with last second heroics and (some of us) cry in defeat. Welcome to our community. Be respectful of others and join in to the conversation...
Join us