Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 35 of 35
  1. #31
    Senior Member The Thriller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    On the Booz Cruise
    Posts
    11,370
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    13852
    Rep Adjustment Power
    73
    No. Just no.
    Lakers Suck.

  2. #32
    In pursuit of #9 Dr. Jones's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    61,522
    Mentioned
    129 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    95596
    Rep Adjustment Power
    100
    Quote Originally Posted by Verlin View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Nerd.
    Burn.
    http://shop.donaldjtrump.com/v/vspfi...ODTRH-RD-2.jpg



    Fortune and glory, kid. Fortune and glory.

  3. #33
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    5,938
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    13965
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by PKM View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Burn.
    To the third homey!

  4. #34
    Punch Bowl Re-Filler
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Enemy territory (Warrior land)
    Posts
    20,834
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    39897
    Rep Adjustment Power
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by Darkwing Duck View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    And in your trade scenario, the Jazz are getting??? Role players and an expiring? All at the expense of another prospect and draft pick? Or, in other terms, the Jazz give up interior scoring for outside shooting. A wash. Anderson and Millsap are redundant, and can't play together, thus their perceived combined strength is negated.

    Jefferson has more value than when the Jazz traded for him (essentially two first round picks). Shorter contract, no injury issue as opposed to long contract, ACL injury.
    It would be better just to let Jefferson's contract expire next season (there's the cap relief) and retain our young players and the GSW pick, which should turn into a starting SF. That's better value than Brooks, Humphries, etc.

  5. #35
    Senior Member Darkwing Duck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    6,104
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Total Rep Points
    9571
    Rep Adjustment Power
    57
    Quote Originally Posted by svenguru View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Why are you so caught up in playing Anderson and Millsap together?? Anderson would not be the starter. Favors would be the starter along with Millsap. You could bring Anderson off the bench to play alongside Favors or Kanter or millsap. They are better defensively because the two best defensive bigs we have play MORE(ie Favors and Kanter) We could play Millsap and Anderson at time when opposing teams go small and Anderson guards the opposing teams "center" with Millsap guarding the four spot. This would be an occasional combination but not the starting front court.
    The problem, then, is that you're trading Jefferson for backups and trading prospect for prospect, while also trading a likely lotto pick. That's neither good for the present, nor good for the future.


    Quote Originally Posted by negative reputation giver
    youre inquires are tiresome



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
About Us
We are a community of Utah JazzFanz that are passionate about our team. We celebrate the highs that come with last second heroics and (some of us) cry in defeat. Welcome to our community. Be respectful of others and join in to the conversation...
Join us