What's new

Jack Smith drops all charges against Trump. It was political theater all along.

Al-O-Meter

Well-Known Member

 
Ya it wasn’t theater they definitely wanted to get trump for something. Turns out you can’t do political prosecutions when it becomes too obvious what’s going on though.
 
It was not political theatre.
Of course it wasn’t. We’ve got 4 years upcoming, but we all know what happened to get to this point. At this point, while these 4 years should be a trip, lol, it will likely be a more distant point, in our future, that will judge our era and what the American people decided in 2024. In other words, History will judge better than any of us can do, in the present moment. I see it as a great failing, an abandonment of our ideals, abandoning our belief that no man is above the law. A lot of that has to do with the incredible success of the Big Lie.

I’m confident that History will see the Big Lie as just that:

A lie that does incalculable damage to the body politic, by insuring more citizens, from all parties, will not trust our elections to be honest. That is an incredibly damaging thing for a president to do. We should not have to wait for History to be the judge, and I certainly don’t need to wait, lol. But the people said “no, we want Trump”, so into the future we walk, and History will instruct future generations. Distance in time will sort things out.

Did Americans abandon democracy in 2024, or did they just forget what democracy was? We allowed Trump to be the man above the law.

 
At least Smith and the judge knew enough:

“Judge Tanya Chutkan dismissed the case "without prejudice", meaning the charges could be refiled after Trump finishes his second term”

“It has long been the position of the Department of Justice that the United States Constitution forbids the federal indictment and subsequent criminal prosecution of a sitting President,” Smith wrote in a filing in the election case.

“This outcome is not based on the merits or strength of the case against the defendant,” Smith added in the six-page filing.


From a practical perspective, of course it doesn’t matter, he’ll never be charged again. He gets away with being above and outside our laws. But, no good reason for Smith to dismiss charges, in any way that suggests Trump was innocent. He got away with what he got away with and everyone saw what happened. Except for those Americans who were buffaloed by the Big Lie….


CNN —
Special counsel Jack Smith set out to prove in the United States of America v. Donald J. Trump that even presidents are not above the law.

Instead, his failed prosecutions ended up making Trump even more powerful as the ebullient president-elect prepares to return to office on January 20.

Smith’s decision to bow to the inevitable and shelve his cases over Trump’s alleged election interference and hoarding of classified documents represented a momentous victory for the 45th and 47th president.

The federal elections case led to a Supreme Court ruling granting a president limited immunity for official acts. This is likely to reinforce Trump’s belief that he will have almost unchecked authority and will therefore reverberate through the next four years and generations to come.

And a president – who refused to accept the will of voters, the bedrock principle of democracy, after he lost an election and then told supporters to “fight like hell” before they invaded the US Capitol – will pay no lasting legal price.
 
Last edited:
This is pretty simple. If Trump weren't the president then the cases would continue.

Can't prosecute the president.

I'm sure that if Trump died rather than won the election and the charges were dropped due to trump being deceased the simpletons would be see that as proof it was political theater as well.

Sent from my OPD2203 using Tapatalk
 
This is pretty simple. If Trump weren't the president then the cases would continue.

Can't prosecute the president.
Sure they can. That is why Fani Williss is continuing to prosecute Trump in Georgia. It is all political theater there too and Fani Williss is about to get blown out.



The prosecutions are all shutting down because they were naked corruption of the justice system and they don't want Trump to do to them what they have been trying to do to Trump. They want Trump to be the better human being, and I think Trump is going to be the better human being. These corrupt public servants will all likely walk in the name of lowering the temperature of our nation.
 
The prosecutions are all shutting down because they were naked corruption of the justice system and they don't want Trump to do to them what they have been trying to do to Trump.
Many of us, us being Americans as well, felt, if we were true to our ideals, if we really were different than say, a third world country without experience in self governance, than it was critical that we hold a president to account for the crimes against our ideals. Those Americans, myself included, felt, again, if we are who we think we are, and actually believe none of us, including a president, is above the law, then we needed to honor our foundation, needed to act on our defence of this nation’s ideals, and how we transfer power following a free and fair election. Which is exactly what the 2020 election was: free and fair, no widespread fraud, and no theft of the election by Democrats.

Sadly, for those of us Americans who believe we owed this to ourselves, and, importantly, to our future generations, this accounting, this demonstrating that a president is not above the law, did not happen, and will not happen. Does not mean your position is correct. Trump winning does not make your position any less ludicrous. If you believe what you’re hoping for here, you’re very naive. Trump: “I will be your retribution”. Will future generations think well enough of our ideals, that they will find your position “really poor civics, reflecting a really poor opinion of who we are”? I don’t know. I hope so, but no guarantee.

But, as of now, your above statement is rooted in alternate history, that bears no relation to reality. You agree with Trump. It does show how little you care for your own country, and how we handle our elections and transfer of power. In any moral universe, Trump’s Big Lie is exposed, expunged, and the man is held to account.
They want Trump to be the better human being, and I think Trump is going to be the better human being.
Really? Think they, and you, are gonna fall short….sounds like a pipe dream to me:


-He’s chosen a Fox News host with a sordid personal history to lead the Pentagon, an apologist for dictators in Russia and Syria to be the Director of National Intelligence, and an anti-vax, anti-science activist to be the nation’s top health official.

-Trump has now added yet another dangerous nomination to this list. In a Saturday night post on his social-media site, Truth Social, he announced that he is nominating Kash Patel, a former federal prosecutor, to serve as the director of the FBI.

-Patel’s nomination is shocking in many ways, not least because the FBI already has a director, Christopher Wray, who Trump appointed to a 10-year term only seven years ago and who he would have to fire almost immediately to make way for Patel. Worse, Patel is a conspiracy theorist even by the standards of MAGA world. Like other senior Trump nominees, his primary qualification for the job appears to be his willingness to do Trump’s bidding without hesitation.

-For Trump, naming Patel to the post serves several purposes. First, Trump is taking his razor-thin election win as a mandate to rule as he pleases, and Patel is the perfect nominee to prove that he doesn’t care what anyone else thinks. Even knowing what they know, Americans chose to return him to office, and he has taken their decision as a license to do whatever he wants—including giving immense power to someone like Kash Patel.

-Second, Trump wants to show that the objections of senior elected Republicans are of no consequence to him, and that he can politically flatten them at will. Some of his nominations seem like a trollish flex, a way to display his power by naming people to posts and daring others to stop him. Trump has always thought of the GOP as his fiefdom and GOP leaders as his vassals—and if the Senate folds on Patel and others, he may be proven right on both counts.

-Trump has made clear how much he hates the FBI, and he has convinced his MAGA base that it’s a nest of political corruption. In a stunning reversal of political polarity, a significant part of the law-and-order GOP now regards the men and women of federal law enforcement with contempt and paranoia. If Trump’s goal is to break the FBI and undermine its missions, Kash Patel is the perfect nominee. Some senior officials would likely resign rather than serve under Patel, which would probably suit Trump just fine.

-Of course, this means the FBI would struggle to do the things it’s supposed to be doing, including fighting crime and conducting counter-intelligence work against America’s enemies. But it would become an excellent instrument of revenge against anyone Trump or Patel identifies as an internal enemy—which, in Trump’s world, is anyone who criticizes Donald Trump.

-The Russians speak of the “power ministries,” the departments that have significant legal and coercive capacity. In the United States, those include the Justice Department, the Defense Department, the FBI, and the intelligence community. Trump has now named sycophants to lead each of these institutions, a move that eliminates important obstacles to his frequently expressed desires to use the armed forces, federal law-enforcement agents, intelligence professionals, and government lawyers as he chooses, unbounded by the law or the Constitution.

-If you want to assemble the infrastructure of an authoritarian government, this is how you do it.

The early-20th-century Peruvian strongman Óscar R. Benavides once stated a simple principle that Trump now appears to be pursuing when he said: “For my friends, everything; for my enemies, the law.” It falls now to the Republican members of the Senate to decide whether Trump can impose this formula on the United States.

 
it was critical that we hold a president to account for the crimes against our ideals. Those Americans, myself included, felt, again, if we are who we think we are, and actually believe none of us, including a president, is above the law, then we needed to honor our foundation, needed to act on our defence of this nation’s ideals
This perfectly encapsulates where you and I differ. I have no issue with holding people to account for breaking laws but I see it as wrong to prosecute in the name of defending ideals. That so many on your side see it as not only acceptable, but of moral virtue, to turn the forces of government into an ideology police is frightening. Those in public service who believe in playing fast and loose with laws in defense of ideals need to be rooted out of the FBI. Kash Patel is suited for that task.
 
Back
Top