SI.com article: Tough decisions await Jazz with their talented quartet of big men

Discussion in 'Utah Jazz' started by Jeffrey32, Nov 22, 2012.

  1. Gas

    Gas Well-Known Member

    17,145
    1,178
    148
    Aug 10, 2012
    Having too many big men rules.
     
  2. ONE LOVE

    ONE LOVE PROUD SUPPORTER Moderator

    38,416
    1,165
    148
    Aug 17, 2010
    I agree they trade jefferson. His defense is actually a liability. He is perhaps the very worst interior defender in the leagāļĩe. He makes up for it with rebounding, but he's not only a bad defender, he's undersized (barely 6 10....and really its 6 9 and change). IF Kanter were further along the decision would be easy.

    But the ripples are felt through the roster. Hayward is really a three, who is adapting to the two. Truth is, stats wise, Hayward can be a number one option,. He has scored well when given that chance (small sample though). But moving Jeff frees up Hayward to play the three and gets alec burks off the bench. HE's a first round pick who looked great in summer league. He should be getting minutes. Corbin isnt my favorite coach however.......which should be noted. He really needs to limit Jeff some and play Favors already in a front line with Hayward and Milsap. Small ball, Karl does it all the time, among many others. Because Jeff sucks so bad defensively, this wouldnt be bad. Favors can rebound plenty well, as can milsap.
     
  3. Gyp Rosetti

    Gyp Rosetti Banned

    12,425
    647
    113
    May 26, 2010
    If Lindsey is truly allowed to do his job and uses the metrics I think he uses, Jefferson will either be traded or walk away at season's end.
     
  4. addictionary

    addictionary Well-Known Member

    12,091
    823
    148
    Mar 21, 2012
    things would be better with only kanter and favors leading the team as bigman. millsap and jefferson look too talented compared to them on offense, but game experience will cover it up. especially for kanter. the problem with kanter and favors on the floor is, they usually bump into each other on rebounds. kanter can't jump high as favors, so usually he is the one who gets the ball. but they have to learn to play together, learn their spots, areas etc.
     
  5. Dr. Jones

    Dr. Jones In pursuit of #9 Contributor

    62,127
    2,895
    148
    Jun 23, 2010
    I'm still sticking to my two-year old prediction. They'd rather have the space than take on a bad contract in order to trade him.
     
    NAOS likes this.
  6. NAOS

    NAOS Well-Known Member

    16,139
    889
    148
    May 27, 2010
    Awesome Sig, PKM. Repped.
     
  7. carolinajazz

    carolinajazz Well-Known Member

    5,670
    227
    63
    May 26, 2010
    .....no tough decision at all! Whoever is making the most money, dump him!
     
  8. addictionary

    addictionary Well-Known Member

    12,091
    823
    148
    Mar 21, 2012
    tha's the right attitude
     
  9. Xsy

    Xsy Well-Known Member

    1,071
    217
    63
    Aug 25, 2011
    I feel like just about every NBA analyst so far has written about our 'working, yet not working' logjam.
     
  10. GVC

    GVC Well-Known Member

    7,282
    658
    148
    May 26, 2010
    What metrics are those?
     
    Dr. Jones likes this.
  11. Catchall

    Catchall Well-Known Member

    15,908
    494
    118
    May 27, 2010
    I think the Jazz will take offers on both Millsap and Jefferson and see which one fetches better trade value. You could also see the Jazz re-sign both Jefferson and Millsap to hold them as trade chips. Overall, however, I think the Jazz could trade Jefferson or lose him and suffer the least. Both Kanter and Favors can play center and produce at both ends. Neither is quite ready to take over for Jefferson, but if a decent offer came in for Jefferson that brought in a young wing or guard, the Jazz would come out ahead by making the deal.
     
  12. candrew

    candrew Well-Known Member

    5,755
    484
    118
    May 29, 2010
    There is about a 80% chance Jefferson makes it through the year; but then he's gone. It's glaringly obvious that The Jazz will not make it to the next level with him as the centerpiece of their offense while dragging down their defense. Jazz will quickly lose interest in any kind of bidding war.

    Jefferson would be more than happy to play for Charlotte or NOH or Cleveland, collect his 12+ mil and never win a thing.

    On the other hand Millsap will re-sign with a contract that few of us will be comfortable with - a la Matt Harpring or Memo
     
  13. carolinajazz

    carolinajazz Well-Known Member

    5,670
    227
    63
    May 26, 2010
    ..if the Jazz front office was smart they wouldn't resign either clown for the money they expect to get. The Jazz are NOT going any further with these guys than they are now......so why not save the money and build through the draft? If your not going to win with the guy, why dump so much salary cap trump on him for no viable return?
     
    addictionary likes this.
  14. Gyp Rosetti

    Gyp Rosetti Banned

    12,425
    647
    113
    May 26, 2010
    The ones the previous Jazz brass haven't used.
     
  15. GVC

    GVC Well-Known Member

    7,282
    658
    148
    May 26, 2010
    Such as?
     
  16. Gyp Rosetti

    Gyp Rosetti Banned

    12,425
    647
    113
    May 26, 2010
    The ones you always reference.
     
  17. GVC

    GVC Well-Known Member

    7,282
    658
    148
    May 26, 2010
    ew. I hope he has access to much better metrics than that.
     
  18. Gyp Rosetti

    Gyp Rosetti Banned

    12,425
    647
    113
    May 26, 2010
    How was your Thanksgiving up there? Or are you back in the U.S. and you saw your family?
     
  19. GVC

    GVC Well-Known Member

    7,282
    658
    148
    May 26, 2010
    Just a Thursday for me here in Canada.
     

Share This Page