What's new
By:
Filters

Donald is about to go through some things...

Real unbiased source….
“NEW YORK, March 6 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld the conviction of disgraced celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti for defrauding former client Stormy Daniels, the porn actress who claimed to have had a sexual encounter with Donald Trump.

In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan found "overwhelming" evidence of Avenatti's guilt, and rejected his arguments that the conviction was tainted by multiple errors made by the trial judge.
 
Red said:
Real unbiased source….
“NEW YORK, March 6 (Reuters) - A federal appeals court on Wednesday upheld the conviction of disgraced celebrity lawyer Michael Avenatti for defrauding former client Stormy Daniels, the porn actress who claimed to have had a sexual encounter with Donald Trump.

In a 3-0 decision, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan found "overwhelming" evidence of Avenatti's guilt, and rejected his arguments that the conviction was tainted by multiple errors made by the trial judge.
Click to expand...
Funny you refuse to acknowledge where Stormy on multiple occasions said this never happened. Why not? Can you explain to me like I'm 2 years old what this means? Maybe you need me to explain very basic words. Remember Stormy is paying Trump for defamation... Anyways...Are these words below hard to understand? I don't get it. Actually I do. You really care about guilt. You just want to see innocent people burn.

@The Thriller can you define digitally literate? Because this below is pretty...damn... straight... forward....

"Rumors that I have received hush money from Donald Trump are completely false. If indeed I did have a relationship with Donald Trump, trust me, you wouldn't be reading about it in the news, you would be reading about it in my book. But the fact of the matter is, these stories are not true."
 
Last edited:
"My involvement with Donald Trump was limited to a few public appearances and nothing more. When I met Donald Trump, he was gracious, professional and a complete gentleman to me and EVERYONE in my presence."
 
SteakNEggs said:
"My involvement with Donald Trump was limited to a few public appearances and nothing more. When I met Donald Trump, he was gracious, professional and a complete gentleman to me and EVERYONE in my presence."
Click to expand...
Yeah, funny how her trial testimony contradicts that. Was she under oath when she spoke those words? Funny how tall tales change dramatically when one is under oath….
 
Red said:
Yeah, funny how her trial testimony contradicts that. Was she under oath when she spoke those words? Funny how tall tales change dramatically when one is under oath….
Click to expand...
Lol nice try. Did you see where even CNN is calling her ********? I posted it yesterday. She literally admitted it never happened and yesterday she admitted her life goal is to get Trump.
 
Red said:
Yeah, funny how her trial testimony contradicts that. Was she under oath when she spoke those words? Funny how tall tales change dramatically when one is under oath….
Click to expand...
She has a lot in common with you guys imo. Remember as I said she paying Trump's court fees for lying under oath in another case...... I know we have our battles but you're much smarter than this Red. You know damn well she has no credibility.
Per CNN:
Her responses were disastrous," Honig said, referring to the moment when Daniels admitted that she hates Trump.

That’s a big deal," Honig said.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The charges stem from a years-long investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. The charges are related to alleged payments made ahead of the 2016 presidential election to silence Daniels about an alleged 2006 extramarital affair with Trump.

"When the witness hates the person whose liberty is at stake, that’s a big d--- deal!" Honig said. "And she’s putting out tweets, fantasizing about him being in jail.
 
Last edited:
@Red do you think it's fair that the Judge is a Biden supporter and donor? That his daughter literally works for Biden and has helped prominent Democrats make millions. I'm just curious how that's not a blatant conflict of interest to you?
 
fishonjazz said:
@Red,
Click to expand...
What do you think fish? Do you think it's fair that the Judge donated to Biden and his daughter works for Biden? I understand the childish thing is to call others a troll(you think rap videos are real calling others trolls)but it's a pretty simple question.

Funny how you call others cultist yet have to bully Red into not responding. He's a big boy fish. He don't need your permission or for you to fascistly silence him ya bully.
 
Last edited:
SteakNEggs said:
She has a lot in common with you guys imo. Remember as I said she paying Trump's court fees for lying under oath in another case...... I know we have our battles but you're much smarter than this Red. You know damn well she has no credibility.
Per CNN:
Her responses were disastrous," Honig said, referring to the moment when Daniels admitted that she hates Trump.

That’s a big deal," Honig said.

Trump has pleaded not guilty to 34 counts of falsifying business records in the first degree. The charges stem from a years-long investigation by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office. The charges are related to alleged payments made ahead of the 2016 presidential election to silence Daniels about an alleged 2006 extramarital affair with Trump.

"When the witness hates the person whose liberty is at stake, that’s a big d--- deal!" Honig said. "And she’s putting out tweets, fantasizing about him being in jail.
Click to expand...
CNN is just saying stuff to say stuff. Sure, if the trial were an impartial one then it would be damaging for the key witness being shown to be unreliable via contradicting testimony and an openly stated motivation to do harm to the defendant. This isn't an impartial trial. As you've noted:

SteakNEggs said:
the Judge is a Biden supporter and donor? That his daughter literally works for Biden and has helped prominent Democrats make millions.
Click to expand...

If this were an impartial trial over a real crime then Stormy wouldn't even have needed to testify. This is an effort to influence the upcoming election, and that is all it is. The DNC has weaponized the justice system so that questions over a form being filled out correctly, which wasn't even a NY State form, is the basis for a hooker having the biggest stage possible to generate compelling content showing the GOP candidate in a bad light.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Well that's rape. Straight up. Minimum "assault", but that's ****ing rape.
Click to expand...
Which was funny to you guys just 2 weeks ago. Hilarious actually to you.

And no it's not. She admitted it didn't even happen. Even in this scenario it was 100% consensual.
 
Al-O-Meter said:
CNN is just saying stuff to say stuff. Sure, if the trial were an impartial one then it would be damaging for the key witness being shown to be unreliable via contradicting testimony and an openly stated motivation to do harm to the defendant. This isn't an impartial trial. As you've noted:



If this were an impartial trial over a real crime then Stormy wouldn't even have needed to testify. This is an effort to influence the upcoming election, and that is all it is. The DNC has weaponized the justice system so that questions over a form being filled out correctly, which wasn't even a NY State form, is the basis for a hooker having the biggest stage possible to generate compelling content showing the GOP candidate in a bad light.
Click to expand...
Exactly... Not a single one of these guys here have the wherewithal to address how the judge is obviously compromised. He is a Biden supporter and Trump will go to jail for pointing that out.
 
And now the Classified documents hoax is being exposed.... We now know that the FBI added unrelated documents to the pictures they took and also literally tampered with the evidence. Even Jack Smith admits this... This trial has now removed rightfully been indefinitely postponed...

FBI agents PLANTED evidence at Trump Mar-a-Lago raid; judge postpones trial indefinitely

Reports have revealed that FBI agents placed “cover sheets” onto allegedly classified documents found during its raid of Mar-a-Lago in order to make the photo they took of the documents far scarier.



The cover sheets indicated the highest levels of secrecy — and without question, the media then fell right in line and used the doctored evidence to slam Trump.

www.theblaze.com

FBI agents PLANTED evidence at Trump Mar-a-Lago raid; judge postpones trial indefinitely | Blaze Media

It doesn’t matter whether you hate or love Donald Trump. What’s being done to the former president by our government should disturb every single American. Reports have revealed that FBI agents placed “cover sheets” onto allegedly classified documents found during its raid of Mar-a-Lago in...
www.theblaze.com www.theblaze.com
 
Sardines said:
Vu06TbD.jpeg
Click to expand...
Ohhhhh he deleted it... Of course lololololololllol

Or maybe Cult Democrats are just insane conspiracist. This is their bat s* crazy Russia Hoax pee tapes all over again for the worse than Cults... Read up and apologize for the hate you all caused. I would post the paragraphs of the article below but it's very long explanation of the the propaganda you all embarrassingly fell for. Great picture though. You really showed her without debating a single thing. Jack Smith literally admitted they tampered with evidence. Literally....

www.declassified.live

The DOJ's Doctored Crime Scene Photo of Mar-a-Lago Raid

New disclosures in Special Counsel Jack Smith's espionage case against Donald Trump reveal the FBI tampered with evidence to create the infamous photo--and DOJ has lied about it for nearly two years.
www.declassified.live www.declassified.live
 
Last edited:
LogGrad98 said:
Well that's rape. Straight up. Minimum "assault", but that's ****ing rape.
Click to expand...
This is a really good pt. What’s…. Different from what Trump did to what Harvey Weinstein used to do? Exploit a woman’s desire to advance her career, make it clear what the requirements are, some intimidation is used, and then take advantage! Change the name Trump to Harvey and Stormy to any number of desperate actresses and it’s indistinguishable the difference.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top