What's new
By:

Following 2016 potential draftees

fishonjazz said:
Actually I think we should trade him and anyone else on the team to try to get a true star max player. Always have felt that way.
Click to expand...

I was just messing with you... I still believe in Burks and actually think we should retain him. If he gets back healthy the contract looks like gold and we can trade him in for something more valuable than we get now.
 
fishonjazz said:
Burks too. I think the jazz should always being trying to get a player better than anyone on the team currently.

There are many players currently in the nba that I want more than anyone on the jazz right now and there will likely be a few players in this draft that will be better than anyone on the jazz right now.
Imo its a good idea to try to get elite players.
Click to expand...
So trading Hayward for a 3rd tier draft prospect who is an undersized 2 guard is us getting better?

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
King Cy said:
Lmao

That Hayward hate is coming out strong. Pretty soon we going to have Burks>Hayward post.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Why are you being such an *** today?
I said in my post that Thomas might not be the better player. But it is fact, not opinon, that Thomas has more accolades than hayward, is much much cheaper, and has better box score numbers..... Better on paper.
And it's not like he is surrounded by all star teammates either.

Try to be a little fair and objective and get g-times balls off your chin for a second.
 
fishonjazz said:
Also if you look at stats, all star appearances, playoff appearances then Thomas would come out ahead of Hayward.

I think Thomas is making like 6 million per year btw.

Not saying Thomas is the better player but actually on paper he kind of is
Click to expand...

His contract is valuable, but on court I think you have to plan ways to hide him and he doesn't always work in every situation. I think guys like him can put a ceiling on how good your team is unless he's willing to take a step back and become a great sixth man. He controls the ball a bit much to be a #1 option on a contender.

Hayward is kind of the opposite... you can do a lot of things for other guys because he's on your roster. They are both probably not in an ideal role for winning. Both are playing bigger roles than they should if their teams are going to be contenders.
 
fishonjazz said:
Why are you being such an *** today?
I said in my post that Thomas might not be the better player. But it is fact, not opinon, that Thomas has more accolades than hayward, is much much cheaper, and has better box score numbers..... Better on paper.
And it's not like he is surrounded by all star teammates either.

Try to be a little fair and objective and get g-times balls off your chin for a second.
Click to expand...
Does your paper also list him as being a 5'8 pg who can't guard? Cuz if it did you wouldn't be saying weightless statements like "he is better on paper"

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
King Cy said:
Hawks, Heat, Grizzlies, Mavs, probably a few others that I can't think of off the top. You really think all 16 playoff teams have 20 ppg scorers? I'm not even positive there are 16 players who average 20 ( and I know a lot of the ones that are are on the same team).

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Again, why be such an ***?
I wasnt disagreeing or doubting what you said. I was just curious who those players where and what teams?

Im still curious since you have yet to post any names or stats.

Man, I have no idea why I ever liked you before. You are unable to have a conversation without being a dick unless the other person is agreeing with you.

I shall just ignore you from here on out
 
fishonjazz said:
Again, why be such an ***?
I wasnt disagreeing or doubting what you said. I was just curious who those players where and what teams?

Im still curious since you have yet to post any names or stats.

Man, I have no idea why I ever liked you before. You are unable to have a conversation without being a dick unless the other person is agreeing with you.

I shall just ignore you from here on out
Click to expand...
Why do I have to research everything for you? I have you the teams. Do I now need to assemble a spread sheet and a PP presentation?

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I was just messing with you... I still believe in Burks and actually think we should retain him. If he gets back healthy the contract looks like gold and we can trade him in for something more valuable than we get now.
Click to expand...
Lol @ all those saying the Jazz should trade Burks. He's been hurt most of the last two years and as such has no value. You'd be selling at the lowest point. He's still young. It would make much more sense to keep him around, hope he stays healthy, continues to improve from range, etc, then he either helps you or he becomes a desirable piece for another team - iow, you still high.
 
seattlejazzfan said:
Lol @ all those saying the Jazz should trade Burks. He's been hurt most of the last two years and as such has no value. You'd be selling at the lowest point. He's still young. It would make much more sense to keep him around, hope he stays healthy, continues to improve from range, etc, then he either helps you or he becomes a desirable piece for another team - iow, you still high.
Click to expand...
No one is advocating trading Burks, his value is too low. We are just giving Fish a hard time.

Sent from my A0001 using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top