Lol at Gallo and Hayward being equal.
He is a good player, but he isn't Westbrook, Harden, Curry, Thompson, Durant, Giannis, or so many other "stars" in this league.
one is talking about Gallo being a superstar.
How was Gallo's rpm in the playoffs this year compared to Hayward's? What about other stats besides that 1? How about defense? Gallo would be an okay addition at the right price but he does not replace what Hayward brings.The joke is that it is close based on recency bias.
Hayward ranked 29th RPM and Gallo 31st this past season. That matches the eye test.
And no one is talking about Gallo being a superstar.
The joke is that it is close based on recency bias.
Hayward ranked 29th RPM and Gallo 31st this past season.
Not sure what "superstar" means, it is typically a top 5 player. I have not heard anyone call Hayward a superstar, so I think you are in a monologue, not an argument. Hayward is pretty universally considered a mere "star" at this stage.
Eyeballing salaries, there are >60 max contracts, or ~two per team on average. I don't think there are 60+ superstars.
Every GM takes Klay over Hayward. Hayward is better at creating his own shot, but Klay is a better shooter and his defense is outstanding.Hayward is def in the same tier as Klay.
Hayward played like a superstar in the playoffs. I made that statement and it's true.