What's new

Current Players NBA Draft Final Four: White Chocolate vs. Saint Cy of JFC

Which team would win in a 7-game series?


  • Total voters
    28
  • Poll closed .
Yeah, do you even watch basketball? The stats paint a pretty clear picture too. Johnson averages nearly 2 more assist per game than Thompson while playing 7 less mpg.

Stop it, lmao. Klay has to share the ball with Curry and Durant.

I didn't know playmaking was just assists. I could have sworn it describes making plays. That includes scoring.

Klay averaged 22.3 PPG to Johnson's 12.8 PPG.
 
Stop it, lmao. Klay has to share the ball with Curry and Durant.

I didn't know playmaking was just assists. I could have sworn it describes making plays. That includes scoring.

Klay averaged 22.3 PPG to Johnson's 12.8 PPG.

Yeah because he was on a team with Draymond Green and Andre Igoudala who are able to playmake and help Curry with the load. Thompson just spotting up and running off screens. Not a playmaker.
 
Care to explain why Drummond outplayed Jordan in both meetings last season?

I'll save you some time and some excuses. Paul played in both games.

Yeah, he really outplayed him that game he was a -28 while Jordan was a +29.

As someone who watches Rudy Gobert shouldnt you know that simple stats are everything for a guy like Jordan?
 
I like the construction of Cy's team. Choc lacks too much playmaking for my liking. Also, I don't buy much into this whole H2H matchup advantage between DJ and Drummond by comparing gross stats in games between their respective teams. It's food for thought for sure, but I simply believe that Jordan is better than Drummond - an opinion based on watching them both play far more than 2 games, and an opinion likely shared by an overwhelming majority of GMs.
 
I like the construction of Cy's team. Choc lacks too much playmaking for my liking. Also, I don't buy much into this whole H2H matchup advantage between DJ and Drummond by comparing gross stats in games between their respective teams. It's food for thought for sure, but I simply believe that Jordan is better than Drummond - an opinion based on watching them both play far more than 2 games, and an opinion likely shared by an overwhelming majority of GMs.

That's the thing though. We're comparing my 3rd best player to his 2nd best player.
 
That's the thing though. We're comparing my 3rd best player to his 2nd best player.

Thank God I don't oversimplify stuff and think in this manner. I just don't like how no one in your starting lineup is a threat with the ball except for Curry, and Klay when he can shoot over a smaller defender - about the only play he can create imo. You got some good players but not enough offensive versatility to swing it in your favor in my eyes.
 
Wow. 10-10. I will only vote if I can reach a definitive answer.

A number of problems with both teams. Some real strengths too.
 
Why don't you flip a coin and tell me who to vote for then?



Pretty sure I can guess who that's gonna be too.. LOL..

Well I already voted, so that would be obvious who I think is better.

I've voted for and against you, I've voted for and against WC, I've voted for and against Cy.

Nobody can accuse me of voting based on whose team is whose. You on the other hand...
 
WC should have won in a blow-out
 
You built a worse version of the Clippers.

That makes no sense.....

And this team would destroy the Clippers.

The Clippers main problem is lack of secondary playmaking, length on the perimeter, and depth. I have a ton of playmaking, perimeter length, and incredible depth (my 10th man was a starter on a Championship team for crying out loud). Your team is trash, has no playmaking outside of Curry, and has terrible depth. Your team is much more comparable to being a "worse version of the Clippers" than my team is.

So nice try at making a terrible comparison.

Your backup PG is literally the high usage version of Shelvin Mack.
 
That makes no sense.....

And this team would destroy the Clippers.

The Clippers main problem is lack of secondary playmaking, length on the perimeter, and depth. I have a ton of playmaking, perimeter length, and incredible depth (my 10th man was a starter on a Championship team for crying out loud). Your team is trash, has no playmaking outside of Curry, and has terrible depth. Your team is much more comparable to being a "worse version of the Clippers" than my team is.

So nice try at making a terrible comparison.

Your backup PG is literally the high usage version of Shelvin Mack.

Who on your team is even relatively close to as good as Griffin? What about defending like Mbah a Moute? What about shooting like Redick?

lol
 
Who on your team is even relatively close to as good as Griffin? What about defending like Mbah a Moute? What about shooting like Redick?

lol

You are stupid as a brick. Everything has to be so simple for you to understand anything. I just explained how my team isnt the LA Clippers and your team is more analogous to that squad, but you keep vomiting at the mouth. I'll just copy and paste my main point and hope you actually read it this time:

The Clippers main problem is lack of secondary playmaking, length on the perimeter, and depth. I have a ton of playmaking, perimeter length, and incredible depth (my 10th man was a starter on a Championship team for crying out loud). Your team is trash, has no playmaking outside of Curry, and has terrible depth. Your team is much more comparable to being a "worse version of the Clippers" than my team is.
 
A team with Curry, Klay, the 2016 All-NBA 3rd Team Center and 2017 All-Defensive 2nd Team SG is a worse version of the Clippers.

LMAO
 
Back
Top