We should start a new thread now that this one turned into a pile of Kyoto.
This sexually suggestive girl was the game girl for the Bucks game.Ah, no I wouldn't. I'm not in prison. I can browse the internet at work. It's no issue. But having sexually suggestive images makes me cautious every time I have to visit the site. Which is often. I rarely use Facebook, and I don't know how it works. But it had images that are more graphic, then it is absolutely, unquestionably, unacceptable. Anyone who works at a largish company knows this.

This sexually suggestive girl was the game girl for the Bucks game.
C'mon man. Live a little. View attachment 6873
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
If a game girl was seen on your work computer, you wouldn't get in trouble with HR over our PG game girl pictures; you would get in trouble for being on a fan forum during work hours.
There are more graphic photos and ads on Facebook, but it is socially acceptable to scroll Facebook on work computers.
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
How about a compromise - we only post Jazz dancers since they are employees of the organization. Does that make it better?/facepalm
It has nothing to do with living a little. I don't care about the sexual content. I can go to Pornhub after I get home. What I said was, companies give sexual harassment training that covers these things. This is not just me. Others in this thread agree. I am asking for courtesy. Not trying to take away your rights.

How about a compromise - we only post Jazz dancers since they are employees of the organization. Does that make it better?
View attachment 6874
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
Do we always have to marginalize women in these game threads?
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
Look, I understand your point. I'm kind of just playing devils advocate. I have worked in a number of different areas and I would have questions asked if somebody saw a pic.Still too revealing. The one you posted above is acceptable. Since she's in every day clothes.
Look, I understand your point. I'm kind of just playing devils advocate. I have worked in a number of different areas and I would have questions asked if somebody saw a pic.
But I have a personal policy. When I'm on this site at work, I scroll past pictures quickly. When I'm on the app at home, I might look. You just need a better internal guide.
When you are at work, you can go to Pornhub too but you don't right? Is your work supposed to ban porn hub even though you have the option to ignore it? That's exactly like asking another poster to remove a game girl so you don't have to ignore it.
Sent from my VS995 using JazzFanz mobile app
I don't understand your argument. Visiting Jazzfanz does not violate any work policies (unless you work in a place that doesn't allow employees to use the internet for non-business purposes). I am free to take a 15 minute break, log onto Jazzfanz, and talk about Donovan Mitchell. If someone passed by and saw me typing a bunch of text on a sports forum, it won't be a problem. If someone saw me looking at a sexual image, then there might be (or at porn!). Yes, I can just not visit the site. Or I can always just scroll fast whenever I spot an image (LOL). Or, you can just not post a revealing game girl in the open. Right?