What's new
By:

The official "let's reelect Trump" thread

Heathme said:
I get that you liberals, anti-trumpers, whatever you call yourselves, want to shame those that disagree with you. It just isn't going to work. Let's stick to the issues and the actual challenges that are facing the country right now. Let's not ignore the terrible policies that most of the democratic presidential candidates want to implement in our country. Let's not ignore the crisis on the border that just 6 months ago was mocked by the left as not a crisis. Let's focus on the 125 or so judges that have been put into place that do not want to "fundamentally change" our country and believe in the Constitution.
Click to expand...
Question: if there were a republican Challenger to Trump with a better track record on race, zero sexual assault allegations, and better history of working across the aisle to get things done, who also promised to put America first, which would you support?

Say Romney wants to run again. Similar ticket to last run for him only stronger pro-american stance. Which do you vote for?
 
One Brow said:
He's also a corrupt, incompetent, nepotistic, blame-throwing, racist, misogynistic, and hateful rapist. He's never apologized for that, either.

I can get by with straight-talking, banker, fratguys (like Obama).
Click to expand...

Alleged rapist. But still, the rest is enough. It should be at least.
 
fishonjazz said:
You don't know what effect a different president would have though. You probably think you so, but you don't.

See you settle. You are cool with a piece of **** for president cause the economy is good and stuff.
What if the economy was good and stuff and the president wasn't a piece of ****? Wouldn't that be preferable?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...
No most are happy when "their side" wins almost regardless of what that really means. The president has as much to do with the economy as I do with running the company I work for, and I'm about 6 levels removed from the CEO.
 
LogGrad98 said:
Question: if there were a republican Challenger to Trump with a better track record on race, zero sexual assault allegations, and better history of working across the aisle to get things done, who also promised to put America first, which would you support?

Say Romney wants to run again. Similar ticket to last run for him only stronger pro-american stance. Which do you vote for?
Click to expand...

I would support the better person in that case. Believe me, I loved Romney and thought he would be amazing. Once I saw him bow down to the media and Obama, I knew he would lose. I need someone that is good AND fights back. Trump fights back even though he is not a moral man. The good of the country as a whole is more important to me than how "good" the president is.
 
Heathme said:
I would support the better person in that case. Believe me, I loved Romney and thought he would be amazing. Once I saw him bow down to the media and Obama, I knew he would lose. I need someone that is good AND fights back. Trump fights back even though he is not a moral man. The good of the country as a whole is more important to me than how "good" the president is.
Click to expand...
So you're saying if Romney or a similar candidate went against Trump you would still choose Trump? To you the fighting back is the single most important thing then.
 
LogGrad98 said:
No most are happy when "their side" wins almost regardless of what that really means. The president has as much to do with the economy as I do with running the company I work for, and I'm about 6 levels removed from the CEO.
Click to expand...

I disagree. Clinton would have come in and immediately added more regulations, not cut the hundreds of regulations that Pres. Trump did. She would have continued Obama's fiscal policies that kept the country stagnant for most of his presidency. She would not be fighting China and the trade deficits we have had with them forever. She would not be the cheerleader for America that Trump is. It is quite obvious that he loves the country and wants it to be strong and succeed. Clinton would have continued the world apology tour that Obama went on for eight years.
 
LogGrad98 said:
So you're saying if Romney or a similar candidate went against Trump you would still choose Trump? To you the fighting back is the single most important thing then.
Click to expand...

If they did not prove to have what it takes in debates and interactions with the media I would say yes.
 
Catchall said:
Geez, looking at the OP. The political reality is that the leading Democratic candidates -- Biden, Sanders, Warren, Harris and possibly Buttigieg -- aren't strong enough to beat Trump. In order for Trump to lose in 2020, Trump would have to find a way to beat himself. Dems keep waiting and hoping that he'll self destruct, but it hasn't happened.

Trump isn't a role model. He's a boorish, straight-talking, banker, fratguy bully. He's never apologized for it. But conservatives still support him for a number of things he's doing, including pushing for border security, promoting the economy, pushing back on trade negotiations with China, supporting conservative judges, stopping federal funding for abortions, and a number of other conservative policies.

Actually, the fact that Trump isn't a polished politician leads to people believing he's sincere about what he says. People interpret Trump's brash demeanor as unvarnished honesty. They eat it up.

Democrats keep throwing coordinated tantrums over Trump's manner of speaking and personal behavior, but there hasn't been enough substance to their criticisms to make much difference. It comes across as prolonged sour grapes over losing the election in 2016.
Click to expand...

Nailed it. And this is the very reason why he will be reelected.
 
fishonjazz said:
You don't know what effect a different president would have though. You probably think you so, but you don't.

See you settle. You are cool with a piece of **** for president cause the economy is good and stuff.
What if the economy was good and stuff and the president wasn't a piece of ****? Wouldn't that be preferable?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Click to expand...

Yes it would be but Democrat candidates don't offer that.
 
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top