Sigh, did you read it? Does that debate what I said about it?Nice try Ron but one study had it at 93% bias against Trump, and it was made by liberal Harvard University. See you guys simply refuse to except facts. Show me show me and then I don't have time. Pitiful That is why I did not continue I knew I was wasting my time.
I've seen some of these tactics here on Jazzfanz...
Did you watch the Peterson/Zizek debate? Did you enjoy the total inability to even describe what "cultural marxism" is in a coherent manner?
This. If it were real it would have been hilarious though. Great concept.That was pretty funny.
That other one was obviously staged and why it wasn't funny to me.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
For Silisian you could also add:
NAZI!!!! Anyone that posts a conservative point of view on Jazzfanz.l]
Independent outlets have made studies of the mainstream media and found they are 90% against Trump with their coverage. Thanks for the chuckle.
No, White supremacy is not a crisis.
https://thefederalist.com/2019/08/06/no-white-supremacy-not-crisis/
It was Benjamin Franklin, a different kind of troublemaker, who wrote, “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.” He was right back then, at a time when many think pernicious attitudes and actions were vastly more pervasive than they are now, and he’s still right.
Hello goebbels.
Sorry you are still so Butthurt.
Interesting that you mention me without the @. That is mighty cowardly indeed. I found you, kisses.
Nazis propagandists repeated big lies over and over and over again. Congrats, you win the brown shirt competition.
Smile. Now go post a kitten playing piano.
Haha. Franklin was writing about
the ability of frontier community to defend itself as the essential liberty that it would be contemptible to trade.
It was a dispute between the Pennsylvania legislature and the Penn family regarding the rights to tax the Penns to defend the frontier. It argued for the authority of the legislature to govern in the interests of collective security.
Your interpretation is totally bunk.