spycam1
Well-Known Member
Yes, but that can result in another tie. This method would obviously not have that as a possibility.In the past the tie breaker has been whoever had more participant votes.
Sent from my SM-G973U using JazzFanz mobile app
Yes, but that can result in another tie. This method would obviously not have that as a possibility.In the past the tie breaker has been whoever had more participant votes.
Just so we are clear, I have no objections to Spycam1’s proposal.Since we're approaching the tournament, I want to throw out an idea for matches that result in a tie; we've never had a great solution for this.
In the event of a tie, the team who started with the lower pick will advance to the next round. For instance, I picked 7th and @White Chocolate picked 8th--so if we were to tie, WC would win. @David Hume would own the tie breaker against no one, and @gandalfe would own the tie breaker against everyone.
This gives us a logical, no ******** solution. I think it also helps even the playing field for those with lower picks.
Let me know if you hate this idea. If I don't get a lot of complaints, this will be the method we use.
Sent from my SM-G973U using JazzFanz mobile app
As the putative owner of all tiebreakers, I concur.Since we're approaching the tournament, I want to throw out an idea for matches that result in a tie; we've never had a great solution for this.
In the event of a tie, the team who started with the lower pick will advance to the next round. For instance, I picked 7th and @White Chocolate picked 8th--so if we were to tie, WC would win. @David Hume would own the tie breaker against no one, and @gandalfe would own the tie breaker against everyone.
This gives us a logical, no ******** solution. I think it also helps even the playing field for those with lower picks.
Let me know if you hate this idea. If I don't get a lot of complaints, this will be the method we use.
Sent from my SM-G973U using JazzFanz mobile app
I like it. Simple, but fair. And that’s coming from someone who will lose the tiebreaker to most everyone else. I have no objections to using it.Ties are rare; we probably won't have one. But it makes sense to have a good tie breaker established before we get started.
Winning wasn’t his main concern.I would’ve loved to
lmao. That’s just stupid ridiculous. Makes me wonder how he didn’t win more than one championship.