What's new
By:
Filters

Trade Rumors Involving the Jazz

Elizah Huge said:
The only guys I can think of that fit the player type @bigmike is talking about are Jerami Grant, John Collins and OG Anunoby. Considering salary as well as they’d likely be in the 16M-23M range. Not sure who else it would be who’s available.
Click to expand...
Maybe Josh Hart but that wouldn't be someone we need to add picks to get imo.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Maybe Josh Hart but that wouldn't be someone we need to add picks to get imo.
Click to expand...

I mentioned Portland a few days ago (so did you) as a team that likely ends up doing something. A lot do tradable players with tradable contracts.

If we had to add picks then Collins is out as well. Pretty much slims it down to Grant or OG unless I’m missing someone.
 
Elizah Huge said:
If he agreed to that extension I’d be willing to give up a better pick than the BKN/PHI pick.
Click to expand...
I don't think you'd need to tbh. Grant was traded for cap space and a protected first this summer. Not sure if he doesn't want to sign the extension or if Porty hasn't offered it. Maybe its a different market today than it was in the summer though. KO/Vando and BKN 1st is fair... if he's willing to sign the extension.
 
Elizah Huge said:
I mentioned Portland a few days ago (so did you) as a team that likely ends up doing something. A lot do tradable players with tradable contracts.

If we had to add picks then Collins is out as well. Pretty much slims it down to Grant or OG unless I’m missing someone.
Click to expand...
I will do the following if its on the table:

JC for Beasley/Vando - if we get a pick.
Grant for KO/Vando - if all we have to give is the Brooklyn pick and he signs an extension. I'm more in on this than any of the others.
Beasley for OG - if all we have to give is 1 unprotected pick.

I'd rather be a seller and just collect a few picks while losing a bit more... but if we are buying I can see those as good opportunities.
 
Grant has done really well playing next to Dame and Simons... which is likely equal parts blessing and curse... I think Billups sucks as a coach... I think Hardy might be able to use someone like Grant really well.

I'm intrigued... and I'm the tank champ... hmmmm.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
Grant has done really well playing next to Dame and Simons... which is likely equal parts blessing and curse... I think Billups sucks as a coach... I think Hardy might be able to use someone like Grant really well.

I'm intrigued... and I'm the tank champ... hmmmm.
Click to expand...
What's the theory here for the Blazers? Unless they're in blow-it-up mode (which I haven't seen any indication of other than Bill Simmons hinting that they should be), what would they be accomplishing here? I'm not really seeing it.
 
idiot said:
What's the theory here for the Blazers? Unless they're in blow-it-up mode (which I haven't seen any indication of other than Bill Simmons hinting that they should be), what would they be accomplishing here? I'm not really seeing it.
Click to expand...
Yeah... I am not sure other than they kind of have interim ownership and an interim GM and they may not want to do a full blow up so you get something for a guy that you don't want to pay and think is a flight risk if you don't... and it give you some guys you can keep in the meantime.

The other route is they could just blow it up. This is the move you do before you trade Dame (who is clearly frustrated).
 
idiot said:
What's the theory here for the Blazers? Unless they're in blow-it-up mode (which I haven't seen any indication of other than Bill Simmons hinting that they should be), what would they be accomplishing here? I'm not really seeing it.
Click to expand...

They’re 21-25 and are at risk of losing Grant for nothing this summer.
 
Grant would be ****ing awesome if he signed an extension with us. I’d take him over Collins for sure if he did that. I also would still love to get Collins. I would also love to get OG but it really would depend on the price with him because that could just be a 1.5 year rental.
 
jazzfan1132 said:
Despite numerous inquiries on Bojan Bogdanovic and Alec Burks, rival executives have been met with a consistent stance from Detroit: It’s going to take overwhelming offers to move either player. PRICE FOR BB IS HIGH - FOR OLYNYK LOW
Click to expand...
Had we kept Bogi then we would have had a Beasley/Bogi conundrum and Lauri would have been forced to 4/5 rotation.

Also no way Bogi raises his value here like he has in Detroit as their #1... especially not when competing for minutes with Beasley.

Bogi for KO wasnt as bad of a trade as the current trade values might suggest.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I will do the following if its on the table:

JC for Beasley/Vando - if we get a pick.
Grant for KO/Vando - if all we have to give is the Brooklyn pick and he signs an extension. I'm more in on this than any of the others.
Beasley for OG - if all we have to give is 1 unprotected pick.

I'd rather be a seller and just collect a few picks while losing a bit more... but if we are buying I can see those as good opportunities.
Click to expand...
Realistic scenarios and I’d reluctantly accept any with a preference for the Beasley for OG. If we could somehow replace Gay for Vando (hell throw in Fontechio as well) in the other two I’d be as enthusiastic as this guy:
 
Elizah Huge said:
Grant would be ****ing awesome if he signed an extension with us. I’d take him over Collins for sure if he did that. I also would still love to get Collins. I would also love to get OG but it really would depend on the price with him because that could just be a 1.5 year rental.
Click to expand...
It really is the price with OG. I think the bird rights might be enough to have me think we could keep OG but fake trade scenarios are sending like 3 firsts for him. I think the extension rules could become more favorable for teams in the next 12 months (or sooner) so you might end up having options that prevent him from getting to FA.
 
Release the Kraken said:
Realistic scenarios and I’d reluctantly accept any with a preference for the Beasley for OG. If we could somehow replace Gay for Vando (hell throw in Fontechio as well) in the other two I’d be as enthusiastic as this guy:
Click to expand...
Im with you. OG is an elite wing defender who can lock down 1-3 and defend smaller 4s well.. he addresses something we must anyways be able to address at some point.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
It really is the price with OG. I think the bird rights might be enough to have me think we could keep OG but fake trade scenarios are sending like 3 firsts for him. I think the extension rules could become more favorable for teams in the next 12 months (or sooner) so you might end up having options that prevent him from getting to FA.
Click to expand...

I do think OG went from slightly underrated to slightly overrated.
 
Elizah Huge said:
They’re 21-25 and are at risk of losing Grant for nothing this summer.
Click to expand...
Good call! I would also add that their one and only pick is top 14 protected this year.
HermanG said:
Im with you. OG is an elite wing defender who can lock down 1-3 and defend smaller 4s well.. he addresses something we must anyways be able to address at some point.
Click to expand...
Exactly! Also, I just see Beasley as being far more expendable than Vando. We’re loaded with long range sharpshooters that do little else. Vando does a lot of the dirty work - his rebounding and assists are off the charts - AND he became a .340 three point shooter this season after only taking a handful prior.

That being said, as much as Lillard respects the guy (from previous remarks) this looks like the deal. And fair enough, Grant would be worth it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top