What's new
By:

The Biden Administration and All Things Politics

Red said:
I thought it was way over the top, even by Trump’s standards. So over the top, I can picture him laughing while typing it, while he’s thinking “this is nuts even for me!”. It made me burst out laughing….
Click to expand...
A funny thing about it that I didn't even think of right away is that he didn't even mention his wife and the mother of his youngest child. Just Marxists and communists. You know, because the U.S. is on the verge of going full blown communist.
 
fishonjazz said:
www.yahoo.com

Where the GOP's investigations into President Biden's family members stand

The report says that James and Hunter Biden were paid over $10 million by companies associated with foreign countries or governments when Joe Biden was vice president. It does not provide proof of decisions made by then-Vice President Biden that were influenced by his relatives.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

The Biden White House is responding by pointing to what Fox News itself is saying about the report. On Thursday morning, network host Steve Doocy responded to Comer’s claims of “influence peddling” by the Biden relatives.

“That’s just your suggestion. You don’t actually have any facts to that point. You’ve got some circumstantial evidence,” Doocy told Comer. “And the other thing is, of all those names, the one person who didn’t profit — there’s no evidence that Joe Biden did anything illegally.”

Comer said Republicans hope to still find evidence of “active participation” by the president. This was an implicit admission that to date they have found none.

But these stories are years old. Comer had predicted that this week’s report would advance the story by providing new information about the president’s connections to these business dealings.

The lack of any real new developments has opened Comer to criticism that he is using government resources to rehash old stories in an attempt to influence the 2024 presidential election.


That sounds like a witch hunt. They dont have any evidence of Joe Biden doing anything wrong but they sure are hoping to someday find some.


Former President Donald Trump’s children also conducted business overseas with clients who could benefit from government action, which also drew criticism at the time.
Click to expand...
They lost track of the informant.
 
Bucknutz said:
Durham report:


View: https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1658191613540048933?s=20


It looks like Biden knew.

Trump response:

View: https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1658208252495011858?s=20


FBI Response. It looks like they knew what they did.

View attachment 14442
Click to expand...

Do we know what the corrective actions were that the FBI took? What is the primary issue with Biden knowing about a campaign strategy by the Clinton campaign. It would be one thing to say that the Clinton campaign wanted to fabricate a relationship between Trump and Russia and something else if they wanted to expose a relationship between Trump and Russia.

I would imagine that an administration ending their second term would be involved in strategy for their party in the upcoming Presidential election. I could be wrong but simply on the face of it I am not grasping the significance that you seem to be implying in your post. I also don't really know anything about the Durham report.
 
Gameface said:
Do we know what the corrective actions were that the FBI took? What is the primary issue with Biden knowing about a campaign strategy by the Clinton campaign. It would be one thing to say that the Clinton campaign wanted to fabricate a relationship between Trump and Russia and something else if they wanted to expose a relationship between Trump and Russia.

I would imagine that an administration ending their second term would be involved in strategy for their party in the upcoming Presidential election. I could be wrong but simply on the face of it I am not grasping the significance that you seem to be implying in your post. I also don't really know anything about the Durham report.
Click to expand...
This is the Durham report in a nutshell:
IMG_8314.png

www.nytimes.com

How Barr’s Quest to Find Flaws in the Russia Inquiry Unraveled

The review by John Durham at one point veered into a criminal investigation related to Donald Trump himself, even as it failed to find wrongdoing in the origins of the Russia inquiry.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

Only the dumbest and most extreme partisans among us put any weight into the thoroughly discredited Durham report.
 
Bucknutz said:
Durham report:


View: https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1658191613540048933?s=20


It looks like Biden knew.

Trump response:

View: https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1658208252495011858?s=20


FBI Response. It looks like they knew what they did.

View attachment 14442
Click to expand...

I love trumps response. If anyone knows anything about scamming the American people, it's trump. No one knows more about scamming than him.

I do wonder if these dozens of corrective actions were in place back then if the criminals that were found, prosecuted and sentenced would have been able to get away their crimes.
 
Gameface said:
Do we know what the corrective actions were that the FBI took?
Click to expand...
Nope, just saying they did.
Gameface said:
What is the primary issue with Biden knowing about a campaign strategy by the Clinton campaign. It would be one thing to say that the Clinton campaign wanted to fabricate a relationship between Trump and Russia and something else if they wanted to expose a relationship between Trump and Russia.
Click to expand...
They did say they wanted to fabricate a relationship between trump and Russia...According to CIA Director Brennan. Page 81.


Screenshot 2023-05-15 at 6.51.51 PM.png

Screenshot 2023-05-15 at 6.52.25 PM.png

Gameface said:
I would imagine that an administration ending their second term would be involved in strategy for their party in the upcoming Presidential election. I could be wrong but simply on the face of it I am not grasping the significance that you seem to be implying in your post. I also don't really know anything about the Durham report.
Click to expand...
Involved in a strategy to make up a scandal is, with the heads of the FBI, CIA, POTUS and VP. They all knew it was false yet still ran with it. It's a little more than a campaign strategy.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2023-05-15 at 6.43.31 PM.png
    Screenshot 2023-05-15 at 6.43.31 PM.png
    104.4 KB · Views: 4
The Thriller said:
Only the dumbest and most extreme partisans among us put any weight into the thoroughly discredited Durham report.
Click to expand...
Thoroughly discredited? From whom? An opinion, from January? This just came out a couple hours ago.

This coming from the biggest Trump/Russia collusion loud mouth on here. You are an extreme partisan. You fell for this left wing hoax, because you wanted it to be true so bad. If Trump did this, you all would be bitching for years. Put him in jail, silence him, impeach him, treason, death sentence, ect... If you can't see what's wrong with this, then there are many politically blind among us.
 
Bucknutz said:
Nope, just saying they did.

They did say they wanted to fabricate a relationship between trump and Russia...According to CIA Director Brennan. Page 81.


View attachment 14446

View attachment 14447


Involved in a strategy to make up a scandal is, with the heads of the FBI, CIA, POTUS and VP. They all knew it was false yet still ran with it. It's a little more than a campaign strategy.
Click to expand...
Nothing there says that any of them knew it was false. It does say that the Intelligence Community does not know the accuracy of the allegation or the extent to which it may reflect exaggeration or fabrication.

I'm in a little bit of I would need to know more, some of which may not be known by anyone outside of the Clinton campaign.

I'm not saying this with any specific confidence, but it does see to me that Trump did have some interaction with the Russian government. If that interaction was innocent or inappropriate I don't really know. I do know that the Muller report makes very clear that it was questionable and also that the Russian government did make significant attempts to influence the 2016 election in favor of Trump and that some of the people involved did commit crimes. Trump didn't necessarily have to be involved in Russia's efforts because Russia had every motivation to support Trump's campaign with or without Trump's involvement, knowledge or approval. Trump was pro-Russia, Clinton was very anti-Russia and also a very capable politician with deep connections all over Washington. Russia clearly saw that the choice was a friendly and incompetent to be President candidate in Trump and a hostile and extremely capable candidate in Clinton. It was a win-win (both a weakened and impotent U.S. administration along with a friendly whistle, if you will) for Russia if they could get Trump in the White House.
 
fishonjazz said:
I love trumps response. If anyone knows anything about scamming the American people, it's trump. No one knows more about scamming than him.

I do wonder if these dozens of corrective actions were in place back then if the criminals that were found, prosecuted and sentenced would have been able to get away their crimes.
Click to expand...
dJlOzwi.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top