I've been watching more Rupert for my Rupert vs Bilal takes.
I think Rupert is better at basically everything other than finishing/off-ball movement/explosiveness.
Rupert has a much more projectable jump shot (IMO the form and speed of the release is far ahead of Bilal's), a much better handle (not even close), better defense (arguable, but I like that Rupert has a lower center of gravity w/ a bit more mass (slight advantage), and a better in-between game (something that may be useless for either player, so may not be relevant).
But Bilal's tools with those things he are better at are some of the more important things for role players. If Bilal is able to add some significant strength he's just a completely nasty off-ball player. The big question for me is the jumper as it's just as rigid and mechanical as it gets. Not necessarily bad, and maybe it becomes a relative strength 4 years from now on open C&S looks.
I think Rupert is better at basically everything other than finishing/off-ball movement/explosiveness.
Rupert has a much more projectable jump shot (IMO the form and speed of the release is far ahead of Bilal's), a much better handle (not even close), better defense (arguable, but I like that Rupert has a lower center of gravity w/ a bit more mass (slight advantage), and a better in-between game (something that may be useless for either player, so may not be relevant).
But Bilal's tools with those things he are better at are some of the more important things for role players. If Bilal is able to add some significant strength he's just a completely nasty off-ball player. The big question for me is the jumper as it's just as rigid and mechanical as it gets. Not necessarily bad, and maybe it becomes a relative strength 4 years from now on open C&S looks.