Huh? None of us are unknowns. Trump is the most known politician of all time and it’s no secret what most of us think of him on this website. If you needed this conversation to know that I don’t like Trump and believe (as all notable economists believe) his economic policy to be idiotic, then you’re dumber than I thought. You probably don’t recognize it, but this exchange says a lot more about you than anything else.
Dude. Nothing he/she posted was toxic or insulting or unreasonable etc.
Quick interviews with a plan to cover a wide range of topics aren't a format that allows a deep dive into details. Even if Trump could give a detailed explanation on how those policies would work, and I don't think he could, that doesn't mean the details aren't available. The reason making tips free from taxes won't explode the deficit is because those paying tips contribute almost nothing to the federal budget. The bottom 50% of income earners make up only 2.3% of tax revenues. Generally speaking, those paying tips and those making overtime aren't the top 1%. They are the working men and women. A tax cut to overtime and tips would make a big difference to those in the bottom 50% of income earners while having almost no impact at all on the amount of tax revenue coming in to the federal coffers.
Kamala was great. She’s basically through with Fox News BS….
I do think the cultural climate described in the article I posted above(comment #2647) would point to a big Harris victory. But a close win by Harris might be overturned by team Trump, as Neal Katyal described yesterday. I think we are going to need a solid victory by Trump, since Trump will without any doubt whatsoever, try to steal this election if he loses. I’m not even sure Trump has a cutoff point for electoral college votes where he would decide “not worth trying”. I doubt there is such a cutoff number. He’ll challenge a Harris landslide. But, as Katyal describes, a close loss by Trump could, and likely will, lead to a constitutional crisis.
Neal Katyal: We are looking at a very possible constitutional crisis in November
MSNBC Legal analyst Neal Katyal discusses his latest NYT column 'In Case of an Election Crisis, This Is What You Need to Know'.www.msnbc.com
No, I was in the wrong. I lost my cool and unnecessarily lashed out at you. I made assumptions that weren’t warranted. I apologize.
You’re absolutely correct. Thank you for calling me out.
To me, the most interesting thing about the Bret Baier - Kamala Harris interview wasn't in the questions asked or answers given. It was in the stage managing. Kamala clearly only has limited number of memorized talking points, and if you are already a Kamala supporter, the answers are fine. Kamala showed up 30 minutes late and informed Fox News the interview had to be cut short, which forced Bret to trim the number of questions thereby cutting the chances Bret would ask her something out of left field she was unprepared to answer.
thefederalist.com
You do realize that isn't a comment on how good or bad Kamala's interview was, right? The coverage on the internet runs the full range. If you only took in one point of view everywhere you looked, that speaks to being in a silo. At least JF can provide some balance to your info diet, so that is good.
I've seen the interview. If someone grilled Trump half that hard or unfairly in an interview he'd flip a table, walk out, and bitch about it on Not Twitter.
Which of those questions did you think was unfair?
So tips and overtime do make a difference in government income. Just a small amount. He at the same time wants to cut taxes for everyone including the large amount of tax revenues. So cut tax on the large tax revenue and the small tax revenue. Your post didn't do anything to alleviate the concern of what cutting taxing on everyone all over the place would do to tax revenue.
