I think for every vet you need to go through the thought process. There are questions such as:If they had won the lottery, I could see an argument for taking Flagg, keeping Lauri and Kessler and then trying to consolidate assets for a third star while keeping the team stocked with role players and young talent. That didn’t happen, so I think their best bet now is to tear it all the way down, stockpile more assets, feature the young guys and see who should be kept moving forward, add two top 5 picks (AceTreVJ this year and hopefully one of CamAJ next year) and then pivot towards making a big move in 2027 when they likely have 3 or 4 picks available to work with.
- Do they provide something valueable that helps the development of our youngsters? This is TOP priority since we wanna max out the outcome for the next iteration, and that is more valueable than what most of the guys could EVER get in a trade.
- Do they fit the timeline of our next competitive iteration?
- Are they at peak value? Forget history here, and look forward only.
Being useful is more complex, as it kinda depends on the kids. For some youngsters the most useful thing would be that there are vets standing in their way that they need to beat to win a role. Also leadership, professional attitude and work ethic are important, and if you got guys who will keep the kids in check and help them learn good habits you probably wanna keep them.
Full "tear down to studs" is not my cup of tea. It leads to entitled kids who learn bad habits. Like imagine if Keyonte becomes "the vet" in that locker room, just because you decide to remove everyone who is better or more experienced than him.