What's new
By:

Stoked versus Northeast

Stoked said:
Well now you are contradicting yourself. You said "believe nothing", that indicates I can never be trusted as you cannot believe anything. Was the contradiction by accident or are you being deceptive and misleading on purpose?
Click to expand...

No I am not. I can't figure out if you are 70% troll and 30% stupid, or 70% stupid and 30% troll.
There is no way to tell , since you rarely make a sincere argument, it is always dumb **** that leaves me guessing.
I made it clear from my last post, that "believe nothing" is not the same as "disbelieve everything".
 
northeast said:
BR, conjecture is a word I got from Stoked, which I used hoping someone would call me out on it, and we could then discuss its meaning and come to understand that it is a stupid trollish word, because most opinions are conjecture\. Saying they are conjecture makes it look like you''ve undermined the other person's argument , when you have really said nothing. It is just another way of saying "that's just your opinion", but in a trollish manner. I will curtail using that word in the future.
Click to expand...

Well if that is true, It would explain a lot.

I was like... Why in the hell does he keep saying conjecture that much?
 
northeast said:
No I am not. I can't figure out if you are 70% troll and 30% stupid, or 70% stupid and 30% troll.
There is no way to tell , since you rarely make a sincere argument, it is always dumb **** that leaves me guessing.
I made it clear from my last post, that "believe nothing" is not the same as "disbelieve everything".
Click to expand...

Hey Blues who is "putting down" someone now?

Yes you are North. In one sentence you say you can believe nothing I say which indicates that I am always devious. Then you back tract and say sometimes. Well which is it? Not complicated to follow that thought process.

believe nothing = disbelieve everything. If not truly explain how if you would.
 
No, "believe nothing" means disregard what you say because you can not be trusted.
"Disbelieve everything" is different.
I don't care if you don't understand the difference, but I think you do , and you enjoy having me waste my time by getting me to explain it.
I would be very happy for both of us to put each other on ignore and never address each other again.
You do not want to, because you enjoy this. My insults do not hurt you, if anything you enjoy them , so don't deceive us on this point.
 
northeast said:
No, "believe nothing" means disregard what you say because you can not be trusted.
"Disbelieve everything" is different.
I don't care if you don't understand the difference, but I think you do , and you enjoy having me waste my time by getting me to explain it.
I would be very happy for both of us to put each other on ignore and never address each other again.
You do not want to, because you enjoy this. My insults do not hurt you, if anything you enjoy them , so don't deceive us on this point.
Click to expand...

Would you please indicate where I have ever even attempted to? If anything I have stated the opposite. My secret to that is that I know what I am worth and I know that my daugters love me. Nothing, let me emphasize that, nothing you can say or do will change that. So why would your disparriging thoughts and comments bother me?

As far as ignore, well if you ignore me who cares what I say? You cannot see it and should therefore pay it no mind. If anything I would say I am the only truthful one between us on that topic. If you truly did not want to communicate you would put me on ignore as you have threatened to do and let it go at that. The fact that you threatened to ignore me and have not indicates 1 of 2 thins:

1. You do care what I have to say and are being devious when you say you do not

or

2. You lack the conviction to back up your threats. That shows a weakness of character
 
Your first sentence is incomplete so has no clear meaning....
Everything after that I have already addressed previously, and you are just wanting me to go around in circles rehashing the same disagreements that we have already covered. if you really want to continue to extend this waste of time longer, I will request that you make one point at a time. You are going off in multiple directions , extending a spiders web of meaningless ness.,
 
northeast said:
Your first sentence is incomplete so has no clear meaning....Everything after that I have already addressed previously, and you are just wanting me to go around in circles rehashing the same disagreements that we have already covered. if you really want to continue to extend this waste of time longer, I will request that you make one point at a time. You are going off in multiple directions , extending a spiders web of meaningless ness.,
Click to expand...

Yes it does.

I am not wanting you to go around in circles, I am simply aiding you in doing so. You did it for a full work day earlier this week. I will not limit myself to one point at a time to accomodate your inability or unwillingness to address more than one point at once. IF you cannot keep up then I suggest that you stop trying.

As for addressing everything in previous posts I doubt that is the case. Would you care to back up your assertion or will you continue with baseless assertions? I will even give you two places to start (yes more than one).

Where have we covered the ineffectiveness of your insults?

Where did we cover your lack of conviction or your deviousness?
 
It is not a matter of me not being able to keep up, it is a matter of you throwing vague jumbled crap on the wall and expecting me to make sense out of it for you. Apparently, I said something in my last post that you disagreed with, but you have not made clear what it is.
You can start by explaining wtf this sentence of yours is supposed to mean: "Would you please indicate where I have ever even attempted to?"
 
northeast said:
It is not a matter of me not being able to keep up, it is a matter of you throwing vague jumbled crap on the wall and expecting me to make sense out of it for you. Apparently, I said something in my last post that you disagreed with, but you have not made clear what it is.
You can start by explaining wtf this sentence of yours is supposed to mean: "Would you please indicate where I have ever even attempted to?"
Click to expand...

So you failed to notice the part of your reply that I had quoted. The failure is indeed yours.
 
This argument is kind of like. Depends on what the definition of is, is?

You guys really know how to argue. I am impressed.

I am also impressed that you guys are 8 pages deep on this. I would like to see if this thing can go 100 pages. At that point we will have to the judge's score cards, for a decision.

Carry on.....
 
BluesRocker said:
This argument is kind of like. Depends on what the definition of is, is?

You guys really know how to argue. I am impressed.

I am also impressed that you guys are 8 pages deep on this. I would like to see if this thing can go 100 pages. At that point we will have to the judge's score cards, for a decision.

Carry on.....
Click to expand...

In 2 minutes I am out of here for a few days. I may post the rare occasional post during that time. I mostly waste idle time on here.
 
First sentence is not.
Second is, but Stoked can simply agree to and abide by this proposal if he wants to, and prove me wrong.
 
Last edited:
northeast said:
First sentence is not.
Second is, but I think I am right.
Click to expand...

Right, Professor. I'm fully aware that the first sentence, by itself, is not conjecture. It was included to provide context for the second sentence.

To be perfectly honest, I don't care whether you're right or not. I just threw that in because you were going on about conjecture.
 
Bronco70 said:
Right, Professor. I'm fully aware that the first sentence, by itself, is not conjecture. It was included to provide context for the second sentence.

To be perfectly honest, I don't care whether you're right or not. I just threw that in because you were going on about conjecture.
Click to expand...

This is all just semantics
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top